[00:10 - 00:29] Wednesday, March 13th, Fresh and Fit will be joining the show.

[01:28 - 01:49]The top of the show includes a discussion about the tragic incident involving two girls from Jeff's Season of Bachelor being cut.

[01:28 - 01:49]Jeff's response to the incident and his thoughts on a contestant.

[02:09 - 02:18]Discussion about the format of the Bachelor and the fantasy suite.

[04:07 - 04:12]Congratulating Ryan on his mental health post.

[05:24 - 05:34]Recap of Monday's successful clickbait title.

[07:54 - 08:00]Discussion about the spectrum of socialism and communism.

[08:41 - 09:06]Ethan's response to criticism and accusations of being Israeli.

[09:24 - 09:47]A detractor making false claims about Ethan and Hila.

[10:41 - 10:56]A reminder of past haters and their false claims.

[00:01 - 10:56]Wednesday's show includes Fresh and Fit joining, discussion about a tragic incident on the Bachelor, Ryan's mental health post, and a recap of Monday's successful clickbait title. Ethan also addresses criticism and false claims about himself and his family.

[18:47 - 18:53]Ethan Klein is being criticized for taking an indefinite break from h3h3 Productions.

[19:50 - 20:12]Dark Viper has been harassed by Ethan for years and is happy to see him take a break from the internet.

[19:50 - 20:12]Dark Viper has created a 14-page manifesto about reaction content and how it is stealing.

[20:22 - 20:59]JT Chapman calls Ethan Klein a pathetic weasel and Dark Viper agrees, saying Ethan's announcement was clickbait.

[20:22 - 20:59]Ethan agrees that reaction content can be problematic, but disagrees with Dark Viper's approach.

[20:22 - 20:59]Dark Viper compares reaction content to rape and Ethan responds by making fun of him in a podcast.

[20:22 - 20:59]Skitzarello, a journalist, claims Ethan is removing posts about Ramadan from his subreddit.

[20:22 - 20:59]Skitzarello also accuses Ethan of bullying his employees, specifically his Muslim employee.

[10:57 - 21:29]Ethan Klein is facing criticism for taking a break from h3h3 Productions, including accusations of clickbait and bullying. Dark Viper has written a manifesto about reaction content and Ethan has made fun of him in a podcast. Skitzarello, a journalist, has accused Ethan of removing posts about Ramadan and bullying his employees, but Ethan denies these claims and may pursue legal action.

[21:46 - 21:58]The speaker discusses a post on the snark subreddit that has gone viral on Twitter, claiming that the moderators of the h3 subreddit are deleting posts about Ramadan.

[21:58 - 22:04]The post in question wishes a happy Ramadan to Muslim h3 fans, but was removed by a moderator.

[23:53 - 24:07]The speaker and others question why the post was removed and suggest it may be due to Islamophobia.

[26:36 - 26:54]The top comments on the post also criticize the moderators and their actions.

[26:36 - 26:54]The speaker believes that they are being targeted and harassed by the snark subreddit and their followers.

[26:54 - 27:04]The speaker and their team have tried to report the behavior to Reddit, but nothing has been done.

[27:17 - 27:35]The speaker wonders what instructions the moderators were given and suggests that the person the post was directed towards may have been okay with its removal.

[28:30 - 28:40]The speaker believes that there is no way for the moderators to explain their actions without being racist.

[29:19 - 29:32]The speaker believes that the moderators are allowing this behavior and may take further action against them.

[30:31 - 30:49]The speaker and their team have been harassed and their family members have been targeted.

[31:07 - 31:14]The speaker suggests that if they were to create a similar subreddit about a Reddit executive, it would be taken down immediately.

[31:07 - 31:14]The speaker calls out the snark subreddit for their anti-Semitic slant.

[32:06 - 32:17]The speaker mentions a potential solution of creating a subreddit about Reddit's head of communications and PR.

[32:17 - 32:25]The speaker mentions a potential IPO for Reddit and suggests using that as leverage.

[21:30 - 32:53]The speaker ultimately expresses their frustration with Reddit and promises to stay on the internet despite any backlash.

[32:58 - 33:10]The speaker talks about a Torah made out of sheepskin that costs $30,000 and has a finger pointer.

[36:42 - 37:00]They mention someone named Skitsarella and a fake post about Ramadan on the main subreddit.

[38:25 - 38:35]The speaker talks about the possibility of starting a snark subreddit about the leadership of Reddit.

[39:44 - 40:01]They mention wishing everyone a happy Ramadan and discussing Middle Eastern food.

[41:03 - 41:08]The speaker and their coworkers discuss a drink called jaleb and the difficulties of finding Middle Eastern ingredients.

[42:12 - 42:23]They talk about the harassment they face from people on the internet.

[42:23 - 42:38]The speaker mentions a Palestinian scarf that Ab wore and how it was spun as Ethan forcing him to wear it.

[43:04 - 43:21]The speaker and their coworkers discuss feeling comfortable at work and being judged for their backgrounds.

[32:53 - 43:21]The speaker discusses topics such as a Torah made of sheepskin, a fake post about Ramadan, starting a snark subreddit, wishing everyone a happy Ramadan, Middle Eastern food, and the harassment they face on the internet. They also mention a Palestinian scarf worn by Ab and feeling comfortable at work.

[43:21 - 43:40]Person on audio talking about explaining themselves and psychotic haters

[43:40 - 43:57]Lies and defamation spreading on Twitter

[44:23 - 44:35]Frustration with Reddit and subreddits

[44:35 - 44:44]Time check at 40 minutes

[44:35 - 44:44]Mention of ads and Irritical question fitters

[45:27 - 46:07]Mention of Palestine and defending against Zionism accusations

[49:12 - 49:18]Mention of Youtube employees leaking information to hate groups

[50:16 - 50:51]Discussion about dwindling memberships and gratefulness to loyal patrons

[51:02 - 51:11]Mention of reporting subreddit violating rules

[51:43 - 51:48]Mention of TikTok possibly being shut down

[52:21 - 52:34]Discussion about Instagram and Reels being a good alternative

[52:21 - 52:34]Comparison of views on TikTok vs Instagram

[43:21 - 52:41]Person talks about defending themselves against haters and lies, frustration with Reddit, and gratitude for loyal members. Mentions of ads and TikTok possibly shutting down.

[52:41 - 52:52]Audio discussion about YouTube and Instagram content

[53:02 - 53:08]Mention of seeing wild videos on YouTube and cute animals on Instagram reels

[53:08 - 53:29]Discussion of a video involving a grandma falling off a dock onto a boat

[53:35 - 53:42]Uncertainty of the grandma's well-being

[55:49 - 55:55]Waiting for Fresh and Fit to join the conversation

[55:55 - 56:00]Thanking sponsors Adam and Eve and Stamps.com

[59:04 - 59:23]Mention of potential ban of the subreddit "smart"

[59:44 - 1.00:11]Brief description of Stamps.com and their services

[1.01:48 - 1.02:02]Thanking new members and sponsors

[1.02:08 - 1.02:18]Excusing selves to use the restroom before the next segment

[1.02:08 - 1.02:18]Using the restroom before the next segment begins

[52:41 - 1.02:36]Audio discussion about YouTube and Instagram content, thanking sponsors, waiting for Fresh and Fit to join the conversation, and mention of potential ban of the subreddit "smart."

[1.09:03 - 1.09:10]Ethan and Hila are discussing a live stream with their guests.

[1.09:10 - 1.09:17]They thank their viewers for their support.

[1.09:10 - 1.09:17]They mention that they and their guests do three live streams a week.

[1.09:17 - 1.09:23]They compliment their guests' service dog, Coconut.

[1.10:17 - 1.10:24]They allude to a topic they want to debate.

[1.10:24 - 1.10:32]They bring up the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine.

[1.10:32 - 1.10:38]They ask their guests for their opinion on Aiden Ross' involvement.

[1.10:38 - 1.10:45]Their guests do not have enough information to comment.

[1.10:45 - 1.10:51]The hosts mention that the arrested individuals were released immediately.

[1.02:36 - 1.10:51]Ethan and Hila discuss a live stream with their guests, thank their viewers for support, and compliment their guests' service dog, Coconut. They bring up and briefly discuss the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine, but do not reveal the topic they want to debate with their guests.

[1.10:51 - 1.11:17]Judge Ish has allowed extradition to the UK after the case finishes

[1.16:45 - 1.16:58]The speaker has confidence in the accused's innocence

[1.16:45 - 1.16:58]The evidence against the accused is irrefutable in the speaker's opinion

[1.17:26 - 1.17:32]The speaker and his friend know the accused well and are sure of their innocence

[1.17:26 - 1.17:32]The speaker has personal knowledge of the accused and their innocence

[1.18:15 - 1.18:21]The accused are not allowed to leave the country

[1.18:21 - 1.18:31]The speaker has worked on similar cases and has knowledge of the evidence

[1.18:31 - 1.18:40]The news suggests that Aidan's video may have led to the arrests

[1.18:31 - 1.18:40]There is no need to worry about the hypothetical scenario of the accused being guilty

[1.18:31 - 1.18:40]The speaker and his friend would not have been friends with the accused if they were guilty of the accusations

[1.18:53 - 1.19:06]The speaker's friend is a former special agent in Homeland Security and is knowledgeable about the case as well

[1.18:53 - 1.19:06]The feds do not bring a case to trial unless it is ready and have strict criteria for indicting someone

[1.10:51 - 1.19:12]The speaker and his friend are confident in the innocence of the accused and have personal knowledge and experience with the case and the evidence. They believe that the accusations are bogus and that the accused would not have been their friends if they were guilty.

[1.19:12 - 1.19:18] The conversation is between two individuals discussing the United States attorney's office, FBI, and special agents.

[1.21:17 - 1.21:25]The conversation also covers the importance of investigators in building a strong case.

[1.23:34 - 1.23:49]They discuss the use of certain tactics in a webcam business, such as lying about taxes and controlling employees.

[1.23:34 - 1.23:49]One of the individuals brings up specific clips from a course taught by Tate, alleging that he falsifies tax documents and lies to employees.

[1.24:14 - 1.24:34]The conversation becomes heated and one individual accuses the other of trying to avoid the topic.

[1.26:12 - 1.26:19]The other individual defends Tate, saying that he is not breaking the law and that the women working for him are making more money than the average salary in Romania.

[1.26:44 - 1.26:50]The conversation ends with one individual asking for context and defending their own actions.

[1.19:12 - 1.26:50]The conversation covers topics such as the US attorney's office, FBI, and special agents, the importance of investigators in building a strong case, and the use of certain tactics in a webcam business. One individual defends Tate, while the other brings up specific clips from a course taught by him, alleging illegal behavior. The conversation becomes heated and one individual accuses the other of trying to avoid the topic.

[1.26:58 - 1.27:11]Andrew is making a lot of money from his girls and only giving them a small percentage.

[1.27:21 - 1.27:27]Ethan asks if his employees know how much he makes and Andrew responds that it's not relevant.

[1.32:44 - 1.32:58]Andrew and Ethan end the discussion on rape culture and move on to the next topic.

[1.33:32 - 1.33:38]Ethan brings up a guest on their show named Charleston White who admits to raping white girls without consent.

[1.34:52 - 1.35:11]Andrew defends the guest, saying his life has turned around and he now advocates for youth to stay away from a life of crime.

[1.35:11 - 1.35:17]Ethan brings up rape culture and Andrew agrees that rape is one of the worst crimes and perpetrators should be put to death.

[1.35:11 - 1.35:17]The clip taken from the interview was out of context and Andrew clarifies that he believes rapists should be put to death.

[1.26:50 - 1.35:17]A concise and comprehensive summary would be that Andrew defends his guest's past actions and clarifies that he believes rapists should be put to death.

[1.35:17 - 1.35:28]The speaker mentions someone confessing to gang rape, quoting a song from 2 Live Crew

[1.37:55 - 1.38:06]They clarify that it was not a real event and was just discussed on a podcast

[1.38:06 - 1.38:13]The speaker defends the person by saying they were discussing their past and how they turned their life around

[1.38:21 - 1.38:31]The person was a minor when the alleged crimes occurred

[1.39:28 - 1.39:34]The person has been on the speaker's podcast before, but they are not friends

[1.40:25 - 1.40:31]The speaker mentions the person's criminal history, including murder, unlawful carrying of a weapon, assault, DUI, and animal cruelty

[1.40:32 - 1.41:03]The person has been accused of scamming and the speaker questions their character

[1.40:32 - 1.41:03]The speaker clarifies that they did not know about the person's criminal history before the podcast

[1.42:36 - 1.42:44]The speaker and the person had a falling out after the podcast

[1.42:50 - 1.42:55]The speaker and their friend had a disagreement in the past, but they have both moved on

[1.42:55 - 1.43:02]The speaker questions the credibility of the person's statements and actions

[1.35:17 - 1.44:07]The speaker discusses a controversial guest on their podcast who has been accused of rape and has a history of criminal behavior, including murder and assault. They defend the guest's actions as being part of their past and question their credibility. They also mention a past disagreement with their friend, but state that they have since moved on.

[1.44:54 - 1.45:05]Ethan and his team came to the defense of someone accused of sexual assault.

[1.45:42 - 1.45:55]Myron insinuated that it was sexual assault and the accused, Walter, denied it.

[1.50:17 - 1.50:24]Myron believed that the assault did occur and that they have evidence to support it.

[1.50:17 - 1.50:24]Walter said that Myron assaulted the accuser, but Myron claimed it was consensual.

[1.50:24 - 1.50:42]The accuser said that Myron made a comment about her breasts and she felt uncomfortable.

[1.51:52 - 1.51:58]Myron and Walter argued about the issue and Ethan tried to mediate.

[1.51:52 - 1.51:58]Ethan and his team showed evidence to support their side of the argument.

[1.51:52 - 1.51:58]Ethan and Myron continued to debate the issue.

[1.51:59 - 1.52:16]Myron denied assaulting the accuser and said she lied multiple times during the podcast.

[1.44:07 - 1.52:16]Ethan and his team defended someone accused of sexual assault, while Myron and Walter argued that Myron had assaulted the accuser. Ethan tried to mediate, but the issue was not resolved.

[1.55:26 - 1.55:33]The conversation starts with the speaker admitting to lifting a woman's top and commenting on her breasts.

[1.58:35 - 1.58:45]The speaker defends himself by saying the woman consented and that he did not assault her.

[1.58:35 - 1.58:45]The speaker denies any wrongdoing and accuses the interviewer of trying to twist the truth.

[1.58:35 - 1.58:45]The interviewer brings up previous accusations against the speaker and his friend.

[1.58:35 - 1.58:45]The speaker denies any similarities and claims the accusations are false.

[1.59:01 - 1.59:14]The interviewer questions the speaker's actions and asks for clarification on the woman's consent.

[1.59:01 - 1.59:14]The interviewer argues that the woman's account of the events and the speaker's own words suggest sexual assault.

[1.59:31 - 1.59:41]The interviewer brings up the fact that the speaker deleted millions of videos from their channel.

[1.59:57 - 2.00:03]The speaker defends the deletion, saying it was for cleaning up their channel.

[1.59:57 - 2.00:03]The speaker defends the deletion, saying it was for cleaning up their channel.

[1.52:16 - 2.00:15]The conversation turns into a debate over whether the speaker committed sexual assault or not, with the interviewer presenting evidence and the speaker denying any wrongdoing. The speaker also defends himself against previous accusations and claims the deletion of videos was for cleaning up their channel.

[2.00:15 - 2.00:28]The conversation begins with a discussion about the creators' videos being uploaded on Rumble.

[2.01:17 - 2.01:26]The hosts bring up a video from the previous day that has been deleted and the creators say they didn't film that day.

[2.01:33 - 2.01:40]They mention deleting offensive content from their Facebook page and the creators defend their actions.

[2.01:33 - 2.01:40]The conversation shifts to talking about the controversy surrounding the creators.

[2.01:40 - 2.01:47]The hosts play a clip of the creators dressed in an allegedly anti-Semitic outfit and making comments about the Holocaust.

[2.02:05 - 2.02:17]The conversation becomes heated when the hosts accuse the creators of being anti-Semitic.

[2.05:16 - 2.05:21]The creators defend themselves by saying they make fun of everyone and have jokes for every race and religion.

[2.06:19 - 2.06:27]The hosts bring up another clip of the creators making anti-Semitic comments about Ben Shapiro.

[2.06:40 - 2.06:49]The conversation pauses briefly for technical difficulties.

[2.07:59 - 2.08:05]The creators ask if they can say the n-word and the conversation becomes more heated.

[2.08:37 - 2.08:44]The hosts bring up the creators using a racial slur in a previous video.

[2.08:37 - 2.08:44]The creators defend themselves and say they can't show the clip.

[2.00:15 - 2.08:44]The conversation becomes heated when the hosts accuse the creators of being anti-Semitic and playing a clip of them making offensive comments. The creators defend themselves and the conversation ends with the hosts accusing them of being hypocritical.

[2.08:44 - 2.08:49] The speaker made racial comments and used the n-word multiple times.

[2.09:22 - 2.09:31]The other person accuses the speaker of being racist and anti-semitic.

[2.14:54 - 2.15:01]The speaker defends himself by saying he is Jewish and therefore different rules apply.

[2.15:57 - 2.16:08]The other person challenges the speaker to explain what the movie is about and if the description of it being anti-semitic is accurate.

[2.15:57 - 2.16:08]The other person points out that the movie promotes anti-semitic conspiracy theories and echoes Hitler's views.

[2.16:08 - 2.16:15]The conversation ends with the other person calling the speaker out for being anti-semitic and the speaker denying it.

[2.16:15 - 2.16:21]The speaker defends the movie as being based on historical facts and refuses to elaborate further.

[2.16:21 - 2.16:31]The conversation shifts to discussing a movie called "Europa" which the speaker claims is based on historical facts and covers the topic of the Federal Reserve.

[2.16:31 - 2.16:47]The speaker refuses to answer and says that not everything in the movie is accurate.

[2.08:44 - 2.17:20]The conversation revolves around the speaker's use of racial slurs and accusations of racism and anti-semitism. It also touches on the topic of a movie called "Europa" which the speaker claims is based on historical facts but the other person points out promotes anti-semitic conspiracy theories. The speaker refuses to explain the movie or address the accusations of anti-semitism.

[2.17:21 - 2.17:26]The speaker denies loving Hitler and is shocked by the accusation

[2.17:46 - 2.17:51]They discuss watching documentaries and movies about history, including World War II and the Holocaust

[2.18:04 - 2.18:14]The speaker asks how many Jews died in the Holocaust and the other person does not know the exact number

[2.21:34 - 2.21:44]They argue about the validity of the number and whether or not they are anti-Semitic

[2.22:19 - 2.22:32]The other person brings up bringing Nick Fuentes and Dave Rubin on their podcast as proof they are not anti-Semitic

[2.23:04 - 2.23:12]The speaker points out that they do not have to know everything and that it is not relevant to the conversation

[2.23:52 - 2.24:17]They then discuss maintaining relationships and how to meet people

[2.24:40 - 2.24:50]The speaker declines to give advice on how to meet someone, causing the other person to criticize them for not knowing

[2.17:21 - 2.25:18]The speaker and another person discuss their interests in history, including World War II and the Holocaust, and argue about the number of Jews who died in the Holocaust. They also briefly discuss maintaining relationships and how to meet people, with the speaker declining to give advice and the other person criticizing them for not knowing.

[2.25:18 - 2.25:24]She might be bad, but she's sweet based on what is known

[2.25:24 - 2.25:30]Can meet at the beach, ice cream ball, mall, airplane, blimp

[2.26:15 - 2.26:31]Criticized for not having a solution to modern dating problems

[2.26:31 - 2.26:46]Exposed criticisms from other creators and debunked them

[2.26:46 - 2.26:54]Defended against accusations of anti-semitism

[2.26:55 - 2.27:05]How to avoid meeting promiscuous women/thoughts

[2.27:34 - 2.27:46]Behavior should be monitored for a prolonged period of time, banning a girl for 6 months to a year

[2.27:46 - 2.28:04]Warning signs include: lots of guy friends, former/current drug use, involvement in certain professions, sorority/party girl, military experience

[2.28:26 - 2.28:37]Coconuts' girlfriend is Daisy, she can do whatever she wants

[2.31:19 - 2.31:24]Mccocanuts believes posting suggestive photos on social media is cheating

[2.31:19 - 2.31:24]Fresh believes posting suggestive photos is cheating

[2.31:25 - 2.31:38]Maira's (Coconuts' girlfriend) photos are now hidden/private and she deleted followers

[2.31:39 - 2.31:45]Actions in the past don't matter as long as she is in the frame now

[2.32:38 - 2.32:44]Coconuts congratulates Ethan on being married, but he is still trying to expose them

[2.32:45 - 2.32:58]Ethan congratulates Coconuts on getting pussy

[2.32:45 - 2.32:58]Coconuts takes side girls to meet his mom and buys them presents

[2.32:45 - 2.32:58]Coconuts and Fresh are caught in their own web of justifying their relationships

[2.32:59 - 2.33:31]Women should feel empowered to show their bodies

[2.33:31 - 2.33:37]They love their girlfriends and it's not as black and white as they make it seem

[2.25:18 - 2.33:43]Discussion about meeting women and avoiding promiscuous ones, debunking criticisms, defending against accusations of anti-semitism, and justifying their relationships with their girlfriends.

[2.33:43 - 2.33:49]The person speaking has stopped including multiple girls in their videos.

[2.34:34 - 2.34:42]They claim to have multiple partners and their girlfriend is Angelica.

[2.34:34 - 2.34:42]The person speaking defends Angelica and says she is no longer a "hoe" and they do a show together.

[2.36:09 - 2.36:16]They mention that Fresh used to vlog a girl every day but stopped due to people sending weird messages.

[2.38:02 - 2.38:10]The person speaking defends his girlfriend's workout routine.

[2.39:41 - 2.39:53]They mention that they travel a lot and have had a lot of sexual partners.

[2.40:11 - 2.40:24]The person speaking calls out Ethan for partnering with someone who keeps a "kill list" of sexual partners.

[2.41:07 - 2.41:18]They mention that their former podcast partner was critical of Israel but not anti-Semitic.

[2.41:20 - 2.41:40]The person speaking denies being anti-Semitic and says they are critical of the nation of Israel.

[2.33:43 - 2.41:52]Overall, the person speaking defends their actions and relationships and denies any wrongdoing.

[2.42:05 - 2.42:16] The speaker and his conversation partner discuss a controversial book about Hitler's dreams of world domination and the role of Jews in the world's problems.

[2.42:41 - 2.42:54]The conversation becomes heated as the speaker accuses his partner of conflating neo-nazism with criticism of Israel.

[2.44:30 - 2.44:38]The speaker and his partner discuss their personal lives, including their body counts and sexual experiences.

[2.47:30 - 2.47:38]The conversation turns to the topic of religion, with the partner making inaccurate assumptions about the speaker's beliefs and background.

[2.47:30 - 2.47:38]The conversation ends with the speaker expressing frustration with the partner's lack of research and understanding.

[2.48:41 - 2.48:47]The partner challenges the speaker to name these documentaries, but the speaker is unable to do so.

[2.49:14 - 2.49:21]The speaker defends his interest in alternative history and having conversations with people of different views.

[2.49:21 - 2.49:30]The speaker suggests some world war two documentaries that he considers to be "based".

[2.41:53 - 2.49:49]Overall, the conversation revolves around controversial topics such as neo-nazism, religion, and alternative history, and highlights the importance of doing proper research and having open-minded conversations.

[2.50:06 - 2.50:14] Joe Rogan asks if he can read the synopsis of a historically accurate documentary on rumble

[2.50:35 - 2.50:42]Ethan from H3H3 interrupts and argues about the lack of a description for the documentary

[2.50:42 - 2.50:50]The documentary covers topics such as the nuclear bomb, organized crime, and Israel's involvement

[2.50:42 - 2.50:50]Ethan asks for more details, Joe mentions that the bomb was stolen by Iran

[2.52:03 - 2.52:09]Joe defends himself and mentions his success and alpha traits

[2.52:20 - 2.52:28]Ethan gets upset about not being told this detail earlier and accuses Joe of being subservient

[2.52:20 - 2.52:28]Ethan accuses Joe of being scared and having the edge over the internet

[2.52:35 - 2.52:41]Joe offers to set up a debate in person, but Ethan doesn't want to do it in Joe's studio

[2.53:05 - 2.53:18]Ethan challenges Joe to have the debate in person, but Joe prefers to do it over zoom

[2.53:18 - 2.53:24]Joe mentions wanting an "out" for heated debates and avoiding ad hominem attacks

[2.53:18 - 2.53:24]Ethan says he wants to look Joe in the eye during the debate and maintain integrity

[2.54:30 - 2.54:36]Ethan brings up Joe's mother, Joe accuses Ethan of making ad hominem attacks

[2.54:45 - 2.54:51]Ethan says the debate is over and asks if there are any more questions, Joe says he will put together dating plans

[2.55:35 - 2.55:44]Joe asks if there are any questions, Ethan brings up the topic of body count and masculinity

[2.55:45 - 2.55:52]Joe mentions that they receive messages from men who have been helped by their advice

[2.55:54 - 2.56:08]Ethan asks why body count matters, Joe mentions that it matters for women according to Ethan

[2.49:49 - 2.57:26]Joe Rogan and Ethan from H3H3 argue about the details and format of a debate, including the topic of body count and masculinity. Joe mentions his success and alpha traits, while Ethan challenges him to have the debate in person. They discuss the impact of their advice on men, and Joe offers to put together dating plans.

[2.57:26 - 2.57:47]Ethan and the speaker discuss how the speaker's advice can help men in their relationships with women.

[2.58:31 - 2.58:41]Ethan asks the speaker how to find a wife, and the speaker responds by saying that men are the gatekeepers to marriage.

[2.58:50 - 2.59:02]The speaker talks about the importance of finding a wife and starting a family.

[2.58:50 - 2.59:02]The speaker explains that it is difficult to find women who are marriage material in today's society.

[3.00:32 - 3.00:39]Ethan questions the speaker's use of sugar daddy websites to find women.

[3.00:32 - 3.00:39]Ethan points out the irony of the speaker seeking out women who are interested in his money on sugar daddy websites, when he claims that women are too materialistic.

[3.02:23 - 3.02:37]The speaker also explains that he has a method for using sugar daddy websites to find worthy women and not get "finessed."

[3.02:23 - 3.02:37]The speaker defends his use of sugar daddy websites, saying that it is just another avenue for meeting women.

[3.03:01 - 3.03:24]The speaker defends his use of sugar daddy websites, saying that there are professional women on there looking for men on their level financially.

[3.04:53 - 3.05:05]The speaker also mentions the limitations of online dating and the importance of status and image on dating apps.

[3.05:05 - 3.05:15]Ethan brings up the speaker's one-on-one coaching sessions, which the speaker clarifies that he no longer offers.

[3.06:06 - 3.06:11]The speaker accuses Ethan of reaching and failing, and they agree to update the information on the website.

[2.57:26 - 3.06:11]In summary, the speaker and Ethan discuss the speaker's advice for men on relationships with women, the difficulty of finding a wife, and the use of sugar daddy websites as a method for meeting women.

[3.06:11 - 3.06:17]Discussion about a full calendar and past conversations

[3.06:38 - 3.06:43]Increase in price for booking consoles

[3.07:09 - 3.07:17]Podcast covers a range of topics

[3.07:29 - 3.07:38]Testimonial from someone who has improved their life after a coaching call

[3.10:45 - 3.10:54]Response defending the use of red cups and explanation that it is only for the Instagram story

[3.12:32 - 3.12:59]Question about giving alcohol to underage girls during a show

[3.13:36 - 3.13:44]Criticism of the behavior as creepy and irresponsible

[3.14:10 - 3.14:16]Defense of the use of red cups and clarification that it is only for the appearance in the story

[3.14:25 - 3.14:37]Mention of a specific episode where the girl in question was not drinking

[3.06:11 - 3.14:37]The discussion covers a range of topics including a full calendar, an increase in price for booking consoles, a testimonial from a past coaching call, and a question about giving alcohol to underage girls during a show. The response defends the use of red cups and clarifies that it is only for the appearance in the Instagram story, while also addressing criticism of the behavior as creepy and irresponsible. The defense also mentions a specific episode where the girl in question was not drinking.

[3.14:38 - 3.14:48]Ethan questions the sobriety of a guest on his podcast

[3.14:48 - 3.14:55]Guest defends his sobriety and accuses Ethan of taking "L's"

[3.15:02 - 3.15:12]Guest admits to giving underage fans red cups to make them feel included

[3.15:12 - 3.15:18]Chris Hansen joins the conversation and questions the guest's actions

[3.15:40 - 3.15:54]Ethan and guest argue about the morality of giving minors alcohol

[3.17:18 - 3.17:30]Ethan and guest discuss underage girls drinking on the podcast

[3.17:30 - 3.17:42]Guest defends his actions and claims to create a comfortable atmosphere for guests

[3.18:18 - 3.18:24]Guest claims to have participated in underage drinking as a minor

[3.18:57 - 3.19:10]Guest denies these claims and accuses Ethan of false accusations

[3.20:32 - 3.20:39]Guest argues that girls post revealing photos of themselves online

[3.21:00 - 3.21:07]Ethan accuses guest of loving Hitler and using racial slurs

[3.21:45 - 3.21:55]Ethan reads guest's dating profile for a sugar daddy website

[3.22:02 - 3.22:13]Guest and Ethan argue about money and fame

[3.14:38 - 3.22:40]Ethan and guest argue about the morality of giving minors alcohol and the treatment of women on the podcast. Guest also defends his actions and fame, while Ethan questions his character.

[3.22:40 - 3.23:07]The person begins by discussing their use of a certain term and statistics about men's attractiveness.

[3.23:07 - 3.23:28]They argue that they have all desirable qualities in one package and are highly sought after on dating sites.

[3.25:32 - 3.25:38]The person criticizes the other person's lack of experience and understanding of modern dating.

[3.26:03 - 3.26:26]They explain their tactics for attracting women on different dating sites, such as Seeking Arrangement.

[3.26:44 - 3.26:54]They insult the other person's hypothetical divorce and question their ability to navigate the dating market as a single person.

[3.27:51 - 3.27:58]The person is asked about what they would do if they got divorced, and they discuss seeking therapy and amicable separation.

[3.30:43 - 3.30:48]The person is asked if they would negotiate for certain desires during therapy, but they do not answer the question.

[3.22:40 - 3.30:48]The overall theme of the conversation is the person's belief in their desirability and expertise in attracting women.

[3.30:49 - 3.31:01] Desire is discussed as a main topic in therapy.

[3.31:02 - 3.31:15]Negotiating desire is brought up as a concept.

[3.31:22 - 3.31:29]The conversation turns to discussing therapy and its benefits for relationships.

[3.31:22 - 3.31:29]The purpose of going to therapy is questioned.

[3.31:29 - 3.31:35]The desire to co-parent is mentioned as a reason for going to therapy.

[3.31:29 - 3.31:35]The option of using the court system for co-parenting is suggested.

[3.31:35 - 3.31:45]The preference for going to a therapist over using the court system is expressed.

[3.32:09 - 3.32:20]The hosts are accused of milking their viewership.

[3.33:07 - 3.33:14]The conversation turns to discussing the podcast and its viewership.

[3.34:25 - 3.34:32]The idea of doing a mukbang together is suggested as a fun activity.

[3.34:38 - 3.34:44]The hosts are advised to focus on staying married.

[3.35:46 - 3.35:53]The conversation turns to discussing the hosts' alleged "selling out."

[3.37:56 - 3.38:18]The hosts are accused of not being able to have a coherent discussion and being anti-Semitic.

[3.37:56 - 3.38:18]The conversation turns to discussing the difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Arab sentiment.

[3.38:18 - 3.38:38]The hosts are accused of not being able to debate and being afraid to show screen shares.

[3.39:03 - 3.39:12]A boxing match is suggested as a potential resolution.

[3.39:12 - 3.39:23]The possibility of having a physical confrontation is mentioned.

[3.39:12 - 3.39:23]The hosts are accused of being intimidated physically.

[3.30:49 - 3.39:23]A comprehensive summary of the conversation is given as a final bullet point.

[3.39:23 - 3.39:28]Someone wanted a box, but the conversation was about dropping something

[3.39:39 - 3.39:44]The speaker tried to drown out someone with something, but they were not there

[3.39:44 - 3.39:51]There was kinetic sand involved and they were unable to show it on screen

[3.40:06 - 3.40:14]The conversation continued because they did not want to be seen as leaving first

[3.41:02 - 3.41:09]The speaker believes they went as well as it could have

[3.42:22 - 3.42:28]The main topic was anti-Semitism and underage drinking

[3.43:40 - 3.43:59]They discussed the concept of consent and how it was lost on one person

[3.45:21 - 3.45:27]The audience of the other party started to decrease during the conversation

[3.45:38 - 3.45:43]The speaker had a hard time understanding the logic of the other party

[3.47:27 - 3.47:46]The conversation ended with a discussion about love and the use of one's mom as a sign of seriousness

[3.47:27 - 3.47:46]The other party had questionable opinions about Poland in the 1930s

[3.47:47 - 3.47:59]The speaker believes love is love, no matter who it is between

[3.47:47 - 3.47:59]The conversation ended with a final quote from one of the speakers

[3.39:23 - 3.48:05]Overall, the conversation was about anti-Semitism, underage drinking, and the concept of love.

[3.53:41 - 3.53:47] Fresh and Fit podcast discussed various topics, including a sound bite, the Andru tape, and a hypothetical situation involving Walter and Myron.

[3.54:43 - 3.54:51]They also discussed an essay situation, where the man involved claims the woman was into it while she alleges it was non-consensual.

[3.54:52 - 3.55:00]They also discussed a guest named Charleston White, who has a controversial past and has made controversial statements about women.

[3.54:52 - 3.55:00]Fresh and Fit disavowed White and claimed they do not support him.

[3.54:52 - 3.55:00]The podcast also talked about an arranged dating site.

[3.55:09 - 3.55:30]Some viewers in the chat were making hate comments, leading to a "chat war" between the two podcasts.

[3.55:09 - 3.55:30]The show ended with the hosts announcing their plans for a Snark subreddit.

[3.55:55 - 3.56:02]Fresh and Fit thanked their members and ended the show.

[3.48:05 - 3.56:16]Fresh and Fit discussed various topics and controversies, including a guest named Charleston White and an essay situation, and ended with plans for a Snark subreddit. They also disavowed White and thanked their members.