[00:00 - 00:05]The speaker got some Uranium and called the government to ask about working with it

[00:14 - 00:20]The speaker is joined by Nigel from Nile Red on the podcast episode

[01:05 - 01:13]The speaker and Nigel discuss the possibility of being in prison and what they would be doing

[01:52 - 02:02]Nigel does chemistry videos on YouTube and has made bizarre things such as aerogel and superconductors

[02:53 - 03:03]Nigel has made videos involving pee and once considered tasting his own pee for a video

[03:25 - 03:31]The speaker and Nigel talk about the history of detecting diabetes and how it used to involve tasting urine

[05:02 - 05:12]Nigel once boiled his own urine to make a sweetener from urea in his backyard

[05:02 - 05:12]The speaker and Nigel discuss how they got into chemistry and creating YouTube content

[06:33 - 06:42]The speaker's neighbors are tolerant of his chemistry experiments, including distilling mercury in his driveway

[07:23 - 07:35]Nigel's content is described as "random projects" and he used to build things as a kid

[07:23 - 07:35]The speaker and Nigel discuss their interest in fireworks and firecrackers

[00:00 - 07:35]The podcast episode features the speaker and guest Nigel from Nile Red discussing their interest in chemistry and creating YouTube content, including Nigel's videos involving urine and the speaker's experiments with Uranium and mercury. They also touch on their childhood interests in building and fireworks.

[13:23 - 13:30] The person and their friend were fascinated by fire at a young age (around 9 or 10)

[13:31 - 13:38]They would play with firecrackers and make smoke bombs using a book they found in the library

[13:31 - 13:38]They also experimented with homemade explosive devices, using potassium nitrate and paint thinner

[13:40 - 13:45]The person's father was surprisingly tolerant of their dangerous activities, likely because he did similar things as a child

[13:45 - 13:52]The person's mother was not as pleased and would get angry at them for their actions

[13:45 - 13:52]One specific memory was of them lighting a rag soaked in paint thinner on fire and swinging it around on a stick

[07:35 - 14:02]Overall, the person and their friend engaged in risky and potentially harmful activities involving fire at a young age.

[14:15 - 14:23] The speaker and their brother used to play with torches and other fire-related objects

[14:24 - 14:29]One day, the speaker's brother used WD-40 on a rag and blew on it to create a fiery effect

[14:30 - 14:37]The speaker's brother would use the fiery stick to scare wasps, but the mother caught them and told them to stop

[16:58 - 17:09]The speaker was scared of fire for two years, but eventually got over it

[17:25 - 17:33]The speaker and their friend would light things on fire during the summer when there was white fluff everywhere

[18:27 - 18:36]One day, the fire got out of control and almost caused a bushfire

[19:43 - 19:50]The speaker's friend threw away his lighter and they both vowed to never light a fire again

[20:03 - 20:11]The speaker's brain eventually got over the fear and they began to enjoy fires again

[20:41 - 20:48]The speaker recently matched with someone who mentioned having a fire in their backyard, but the speaker was still hesitant to participate

[14:02 - 20:48]The speaker is now able to enjoy fires without fear, but still remembers the dangerous experience they had.

[20:48 - 20:58] Brought back negative feeling related to guilt and owning a lighter

[20:59 - 21:16]Thought they would go to "kid jail" for playing with fire

[20:59 - 21:16]Wanted to go to med school and thought their life would be over

[21:16 - 21:25]Represented a lot of negativity, didn't want to own matches or a lighter

[21:34 - 21:41]Eventually got over it, stopped being afraid

[21:41 - 21:46]Had a phase of lighting things on fire, like lighting ants on fire

[22:11 - 22:18]Hand made firecrackers with a friend, stopped after realizing how dangerous they were

[22:11 - 22:18]Dad taught them how to make a firecracker that shoots a projectile

[22:43 - 22:51]Tried to take apart firecrackers and realized it was a crime

[24:41 - 24:48]Made one with a BB and too many BBs, hand got injured but no permanent damage

[26:39 - 26:47]Bought a blowtorch in grade 7 and kept it in locker

[26:57 - 27:02]Showed it to other kids, burnt locker a few times

[27:21 - 27:31]Used it for first chemistry experiment to make colored pennies

[27:21 - 27:31]Saw it on YouTube and thought it was magic

[20:48 - 28:00]Lasting memory and interest in science and chemistry sparked from these experiences

[28:17 - 28:22] The speaker talks about an experiment he did in high school involving zinc metal and drain cleaner, but it ultimately failed.

[29:41 - 29:53]He also attempted to make flash powder using potassium perchlorate and aluminum powder, but was unsuccessful due to difficulty obtaining the aluminum powder.

[30:46 - 30:59]He didn't understand electrolysis at the time but used it as a tool to get what he wanted.

[31:12 - 31:25]He didn't pursue chemistry in high school but later became more interested in it during college and grad school.

[34:02 - 34:13]He was able to work with chemicals that others considered scary or dangerous, such as bromine, and realized they were not as dangerous as they were made out to be.

[34:26 - 34:34]He realized that most people in grad school have specialized knowledge and are not familiar with a broad range of chemistry.

[34:26 - 34:34]The speaker's interest in chemistry is more focused on the practical applications rather than the theoretical processes.

[28:00 - 35:10]Overall, the speaker has a unique and practical approach to chemistry and has pushed the boundaries of what is considered safe in the field.

[37:22 - 37:29] The speaker talks about his experience working with various chemicals and his fear of making mistakes while using them.

[39:06 - 39:12]He mentions that he is not an expert in one specific area of chemistry, but rather has a general knowledge of a variety of topics.

[39:39 - 39:49]The speaker talks about his skill of being able to navigate new chemistry experiments with confidence.

[40:10 - 40:18]He mentions that he often plans out his procedures and movements in order to make the experiments look smooth and easy in his videos.

[40:29 - 40:34]The speaker discusses the potential danger of working with chemicals and the precautions he takes, such as having an antidote on hand.

[40:29 - 40:34]He brings up the topic of liability and whether his videos may give viewers a false sense of confidence in handling dangerous chemicals.

[40:29 - 40:34]The speaker emphasizes the importance of being cautious and prepared when working with chemicals.

[40:59 - 41:07]His videos may make chemistry experiments look easy, but in reality they can be messy and dangerous.

[41:07 - 41:13]The speaker also talks about his experience working with bromine and how he has become more comfortable with it over time.

[41:23 - 41:30]He mentions that he has spilled chemicals on himself before and always keeps an antidote nearby.

[35:10 - 41:42]Overall, the speaker discusses his experience and skill in navigating new chemistry experiments with confidence and safety.

[41:42 - 41:48] The speaker talks about a chemical that disappears when sprayed on.

[41:54 - 42:00]They mention being careful and wearing gloves to avoid getting the chemical on their skin.

[42:23 - 42:29]The speaker recalls getting a scar from acid while filming a video for someone else.

[42:44 - 43:04]They discuss how certain jobs can cater to their mentality towards danger and their desire for interesting ideas, such as being a YouTuber.

[43:35 - 43:43]The speaker talks about the first video the listener saw of theirs, which involved buying anal lube.

[44:53 - 45:05]They mention that this video made them realize how different their content is now compared to when they first started making videos.

[47:39 - 47:45]The speaker mentions an eBay heyday where they were able to buy chemicals that are now heavily controlled or restricted.

[48:35 - 48:43]The speaker discusses how certain chemicals can be made without a license, but cannot be exported or imported.

[48:43 - 48:50]They bring up making uranium glass and being careful with the process.

[41:42 - 48:50]The speaker discusses their experience with a disappearing chemical, being careful while handling dangerous substances, and the evolution of their content on YouTube. They also mention a period of time where they were able to buy restricted chemicals on eBay and the process of making uranium glass.

[49:00 - 49:06]The speaker talks about acquiring uranium and being put on a list for it.

[49:14 - 49:19]He explains that he can legally buy uranium and ship it to himself.

[50:15 - 50:21]The speaker discusses the differences between uranium glass and regular glass and how uranium glows under a black light.

[50:45 - 50:52]He talks about his concerns for the legal implications of working with uranium.

[50:59 - 51:10]The speaker also mentions the regulations for using radioactive materials for their radioactive properties.

[51:45 - 51:55]He explains that the government told him there are no laws for hobbyists working with uranium for its fluorescent properties.

[52:15 - 52:25]He talks about his concerns for waste management and what he was told by the government about disposing of contaminated materials.

[53:39 - 53:46]The speaker discusses his struggles with registering as a business and getting insurance.

[54:16 - 54:25]He talks about a time when a chemical leaked into a room and caused irritation.

[55:15 - 55:22]The speaker mentions that he now has his own lab and follows safety regulations.

[55:35 - 55:42]The speaker mentions his initial struggles with getting certified as a lab.

[48:50 - 55:42]The speaker talks about acquiring uranium, his concerns for the legal implications of working with it, and his struggles with registering as a business and getting insurance. He also discusses his experiences with chemicals leaking and how he now has his own lab that follows safety regulations.

[55:43 - 1.02:14]Chemicals can be restricted and regulated by the government, but there are ways to get around it. -For example, people used to make meth by purchasing legal chemicals and combining them. -The government then made those chemicals illegal, so people started using other chemicals to make meth. -This cycle continued until the chemicals used to make meth were so obscure that they could only be purchased from a chemical company, with restrictions and monitoring. -There are still ways to get around these restrictions, but it is becoming increasingly difficult. -Chemicals like bromine, which is in the same family as chlorine, are commonly used in disinfectants and spa products. -It is visually appealing and has a cool black color, making it popular in organic synthesis. -There are no specific laws or permits for owning certain chemicals, but it is up to the discretion of individual chemical companies to sell them. -Chemists do not constantly refer to the periodic table, but it is a common joke in the field. -A chemical license does not exist, but chemical companies have a strong hold on who can buy certain chemicals. -These restrictions and regulations are in place to prevent the production of illegal substances like meth. -The government and sketchy chemists have been in a constant race to regulate and find ways around the production of meth. -Meth is one of the most commonly synthesized illegal substances. -Concisely, chemicals can be restricted and regulated by the government, but there are ways to get around these regulations, making it difficult to control the production of illegal substances like meth.

[1.02:29 - 1.02:36]People were illegally synthesizing meth, often importing ingredients from China.

[1.03:24 - 1.03:32]Chinese websites advertised designer drugs similar to meth for "research purposes."

[1.03:24 - 1.03:32]The speaker had a friend who knew a lot about making meth but didn't actively make it.

[1.03:33 - 1.03:40]Sketchy chemicals could be found on eBay, but the speaker never purchased any.

[1.05:42 - 1.05:48]Chemical companies can be expensive, so the speaker often had to purify chemicals himself.

[1.07:29 - 1.07:36]Chemistry can be scary and complex, with different branches like inorganic and organic chemistry.

[1.08:29 - 1.08:36]Inorganic chemistry deals with non-carbon-based molecules, while organic chemistry focuses on carbon-based molecules.

[1.09:15 - 1.09:26]There is crossover between the two branches, such as in the case of catalysts.

[1.02:14 - 1.09:36]People were illegally making and importing meth, while some Chinese websites advertised designer drugs. The speaker's friend had knowledge about making meth but did not actively do so. Sketchy chemicals could be found on eBay, and chemical companies can be expensive. Chemistry can be complex and scary, with different branches such as inorganic and organic chemistry. The speaker's grad studies involved working with inorganic molecules.

[1.10:03 - 1.10:10] The speaker discusses the crossover between organic and inorganic chemistry.

[1.10:53 - 1.11:01]They talk about their early interest in chemistry as a child, including making flash powder and attempting to make Thermite.

[1.12:20 - 1.12:27]The speaker's father had a background in science, which influenced their interest in the subject.

[1.12:32 - 1.12:39]In high school, the speaker struggled with chemistry and did not do well in the class.

[1.13:06 - 1.13:15]However, they enjoyed organic chemistry and found it to be like a game.

[1.13:15 - 1.13:20]They were unsuccessful in their attempts but enjoyed learning about the process.

[1.13:45 - 1.13:54]In college, the speaker continued to have a passion for chemistry and even attempted to extract pure capsaicin from peppers.

[1.15:50 - 1.15:58]The speaker concludes by saying that they have always had a strong interest in chemistry and enjoy the problem-solving aspect of it.

[1.15:50 - 1.15:58]The speaker's interest in chemistry has led them to combine it with their interest in filmmaking.

[1.16:08 - 1.16:13]The group discusses a previous interaction where the speaker had given them pure capsaicin to try.

[1.16:19 - 1.16:25]The speaker often did science projects without proper safety precautions, leading to exposure to chemicals and capsaicin.

[1.09:36 - 1.16:59]Overall, the speaker has had a long-standing passion for chemistry, which has evolved and developed over time.

[1.16:59 - 1.17:08] The speaker and another person have both improved their tolerance for spicy food.

[1.17:08 - 1.17:13]The speaker had a ghost pepper for the first time this year.

[1.17:08 - 1.17:13]The dose of spice matters and fresh peppers can be worse than capsaicin.

[1.17:23 - 1.17:28]The speaker finds spicy wing challenges to be worse than capsaicin.

[1.18:18 - 1.18:26]The speaker had a vial of capsaicin for a video and brought a small amount on a trip.

[1.18:45 - 1.18:50]TSA did not react to the speaker's vial of capsaicin.

[1.20:41 - 1.20:49]Walter White's methods are basic and not complicated.

[1.20:51 - 1.20:58]The speaker's lab purifies all chemicals and Breaking Bad's portrayal of chemistry is simplified.

[1.21:56 - 1.22:06]The speaker finds it odd when people ask if they can make blue meth.

[1.22:12 - 1.22:26]People's view of chemistry can be simplified or misinformed.

[1.16:59 - 1.24:05]The speaker and another person have improved their tolerance for spicy food and the speaker has tried a ghost pepper. They discuss the differences between fresh peppers and capsaicin and TSA did not react to the speaker's vial of capsaicin. The speaker's lab purifies all chemicals and they discuss the simplified portrayal of chemistry in Breaking Bad. They also mention the odd requests for blue meth and the general public's simplified view of chemistry.

[1.24:05 - 1.24:14] The discussion is about the use of hydrofluoric acid in Breaking Bad and its accuracy in dissolving bodies.

[1.24:20 - 1.24:25]The Mythbusters attempted to dissolve a pig with hydrofluoric acid, but it did not work as effectively as in Breaking Bad.

[1.24:38 - 1.24:47]Hydrofluoric acid is not commonly used and is difficult to obtain in large quantities.

[1.26:42 - 1.26:48]It is used for glass etching in industry and is sold in plastic bottles.

[1.27:13 - 1.27:20]It cannot be used with glassware and must be distilled using stainless steel.

[1.28:45 - 1.28:55]The more steps taken to dispose of a body, the more evidence is left behind.

[1.29:02 - 1.29:08]The best way to dispose of a body is to not have a body.

[1.29:30 - 1.29:44]In murder cases, the people who put the least effort into getting away with the murder were the most successful.

[1.29:56 - 1.30:04]The people who were directly tied to the victim were more likely to get caught.

[1.30:05 - 1.30:11]Some successful methods of disposing of a body included burying it in the middle of nowhere.

[1.30:19 - 1.30:28]A deal was cut with a murderer who buried his victims in the Nevada desert due to lack of evidence.

[1.24:05 - 1.30:56]Overall, the discussion explores the accuracy and effectiveness of using hydrofluoric acid to dissolve bodies, as depicted in Breaking Bad.

[1.30:56 - 1.31:05] Initially, there was no crime and a deal was made to not try the person for murder if they revealed where the bodies were.

[1.31:05 - 1.31:13]The family agreed to this deal and the bodies were found, but it was difficult to locate.

[1.31:14 - 1.31:19]The person didn't have a complicated scheme and just wanted a hug.

[1.31:26 - 1.31:31]The investigator made a difficult decision but the person was never going to be charged anyway.

[1.31:32 - 1.31:41]The family received closure but there was no place to dispose of a body.

[1.31:49 - 1.31:55]Dissolving a body in acid is not a practical method.

[1.32:37 - 1.32:45]The narrator has never thought about how to get rid of a body.

[1.33:42 - 1.33:48]The narrator's work involves searching for people's social history.

[1.33:48 - 1.33:53]The narrator has never been contacted by a government agency except for one incident related to meth.

[1.34:56 - 1.35:02]In Canada, there is more leniency for content on YouTube compared to the US.

[1.36:22 - 1.36:27]Canada is one of the few places where the narrator's YouTube content would be allowed.

[1.36:22 - 1.36:27]The narrator has never been contacted for their content.

[1.36:39 - 1.36:46]A lot of gun content on YouTube is only allowed in the US.

[1.37:19 - 1.37:28]The narrator bought a large funnel for research purposes, which is unusual in their field.

[1.37:19 - 1.37:28]The narrator worked in a lab where they would sometimes use a large funnel to make chemicals in larger quantities.

[1.37:28 - 1.37:35]Most people only use this type of funnel to make larger amounts of chemicals.

[1.37:28 - 1.37:35]This type of funnel is not commonly used in research and is considered sketchy.

[1.37:42 - 1.37:49]This funnel is specialized and made of glass and is used in a vacuum.

[1.37:42 - 1.37:49]The funnel is made of glass and is used in a vacuum.

[1.30:56 - 1.37:49]The narrator discusses a deal made with someone who had committed a crime, the difficulties of disposing of a body, and their own experiences with researching and making chemicals in larger quantities. They also mention the differences in content allowed on YouTube in different countries.

[1.37:49 - 1.37:56]The speaker is discussing the use of a 22 liter round bottom flask in meth production.

[1.39:19 - 1.39:28]He recalls an incident where he was contacted by the RCMP (federal police in Canada) about his purchase of a funnel online.

[1.40:05 - 1.40:11]The speaker explains that he runs a YouTube channel about chemistry and it made the situation less suspicious.

[1.41:44 - 1.41:51]He discusses the idea of hiding in plain sight and how having a public YouTube channel about chemistry is not a good cover for making meth.

[1.43:37 - 1.43:43]The speaker mentions a channel called Niall Green, where an AI bot would mimic his voice.

[1.44:28 - 1.44:34]He initially thought the videos were real, but then realized it was a parody channel.

[1.37:49 - 1.44:34]The speaker discusses the use of a round bottom flask in meth production and recalls a suspicious incident with the RCMP. He explains how having a public YouTube channel about chemistry is not a good cover for making meth and mentions a parody channel that mimicked his voice.

[1.44:40 - 1.44:49] The person speaking describes a parody video series that combines Breaking Bad with chemistry.

[1.45:31 - 1.45:40]They initially enjoyed the videos, but after a few were made, people started to confuse the creator with the speaker.

[1.46:12 - 1.46:21]There was a concern that the parody videos could potentially cause damage to the speaker's reputation.

[1.48:55 - 1.49:05]The creator of the parody videos reached out to the speaker, and they had a conversation about the potential impact of the videos.

[1.49:21 - 1.49:28]The creator agreed to phase out the parody videos and eventually changed their channel name.

[1.50:55 - 1.51:05]The speaker acknowledges that there may not be legal grounds for copyright claiming their own voice.

[1.51:21 - 1.51:30]The topic of fakes and impersonators is discussed, with the speaker noting that it is a new territory and has not been a big issue in the past.

[1.51:21 - 1.51:30]The speaker concludes by stating that unless the impersonator is causing damage, there may not be much legal action that can be taken.

[1.44:34 - 1.51:41]Overall, the speaker describes their experience with a parody video series and the potential impact it could have had on their reputation.

[1.51:41 - 1.51:56]The speaker discusses the potential consequences of impersonating someone and creating fake videos.

[1.52:09 - 1.52:16]They mention being good friends with someone in the voice sector and being charged for their own content.

[1.52:28 - 1.52:36]The speaker talks about creating videos impersonating a character and causing confusion amongst viewers.

[1.53:28 - 1.53:34]They discuss the possibility of their voice being used in deep fake videos and the unsettling feeling of not remembering saying certain things.

[1.55:18 - 1.55:25]They mention the long process of filming and editing their videos, sometimes taking months to complete.

[1.55:41 - 1.55:51]The speaker talks about the difficulties of creating videos, specifically balancing research and presenting information in a cohesive way.

[1.57:36 - 1.57:45]The speaker discusses how their videos are categorized as educational and the consistent AdSense revenue.

[1.58:00 - 1.58:05]They mention the rewatchability of their videos and the average viewer watching the video twice.

[1.58:06 - 1.58:11]The speaker concludes by talking about the confusion viewers may experience due to the complex subject matter of their videos.

[1.51:41 - 1.58:18]The speaker discusses the consequences of impersonation and creating fake videos, and the difficulties of creating informative and cohesive content.

[2.01:14 - 2.01:27]Speaker discusses the process of cutting out certain parts of audio

[2.01:53 - 2.02:06]Speaker plays their own videos in the background because it is constant and doesn't change inflections or volume

[2.02:24 - 2.02:34]People have told speaker their voice is relaxing and they play their videos without realizing it

[2.02:24 - 2.02:34]Speaker has learned how to make their voiceover unintrusive and avoid rookie mistakes like starting sentences too loud

[2.03:06 - 2.03:17]Speaker uses plugins to remove mouth noises and lip smacking

[2.03:06 - 2.03:17]Speaker has learned to avoid sounding different when going back to replace clips in voiceovers

[2.03:53 - 2.04:03]Time of day and weather can also affect the sound of the voice in recordings

[2.04:03 - 2.04:09]Water intake and speaking technique can affect the sound of the voice in recordings

[2.04:33 - 2.04:39]Speaker's accent has changed over time

[1.58:18 - 2.04:39]Overall, the speaker has learned to make their voiceovers consistent and professional through experience and learning techniques.

[2.04:44 - 2.04:52]The speaker's voice has changed significantly after getting sinus surgery.

[2.04:59 - 2.05:06]They prefer their current voice due to increased resonance and distinctiveness.

[2.04:59 - 2.05:06]Having a distinct voice is important for success on YouTube.

[2.05:33 - 2.05:42]The speaker's voice is easily recognizable and often requested to "do the thing" in real life.

[2.06:31 - 2.06:41]They have consciously developed a natural and genuine voice for their videos.

[2.09:18 - 2.09:23]They have become hyper-aware of this and have even stopped replying to text messages to avoid repeating words.

[2.09:30 - 2.09:35]The speaker's voice and speech patterns are constantly evolving, influenced by their desire for authenticity and resonance.

[2.10:26 - 2.10:33]The speaker struggles with repeating words too closely in both scripted and everyday speech.

[2.10:26 - 2.10:33]The speaker's obsession with avoiding repeated words may stem from a desire for authenticity in their performance.

[2.11:00 - 2.11:06]This may be linked to OCD tendencies.

[2.11:18 - 2.11:25]The speaker's brother is also prone to repeating words, causing frustration.

[2.04:39 - 2.11:25]Overall, the speaker values authenticity and distinctiveness in their voice and speech.

[2.11:34 - 2.11:42] The speaker mentions feeling self-aware while speaking and how it affected their mannerisms.

[2.12:02 - 2.12:11]They discuss how their podcast has allowed them to share more about their personal lives.

[2.13:35 - 2.13:40]They mention having a friend named Greg who they grew up with and did projects with.

[2.13:58 - 2.14:07]The speaker talks about their childhood and how they were into building things and playing with fire.

[2.14:17 - 2.14:24]The speaker recalls how their friend realized their childhood was not normal.

[2.15:11 - 2.15:17]They discuss their love for video games and how it impacted their interest in projects.

[2.15:31 - 2.15:36]The speaker mentions their YouTube channel and promotes it.

[2.15:42 - 2.15:51]They thank the host for having them on the podcast.

[2.15:52 - 2.15:57]They mention wanting to ask the host more questions on their podcast.

[2.16:09 - 2.16:15]They thank the patrons for their support.

[2.16:27 - 2.16:32]The host promotes their Patreon page.

[2.16:27 - 2.16:32]The host promotes their social media and encourages listeners to interact.

[2.11:25 - 2.16:40]The speaker discusses their self-awareness while speaking and how it changed their mannerisms. They talk about their childhood, friendship with Greg, and love for video games. They promote their YouTube channel and thank the host for having them on the podcast. The host promotes their Patreon page and social media before saying goodbye.