[00:02 - 00:08]Introduction to the history podcast episode 216

[00:44 - 00:51]Speaker's voice is damaged due to attending Oliver Tree's concert, where people were smoking weed

[00:44 - 00:51]Speaker's voice is damaged due to attending Oliver Tree's concert, where people were smoking weed

[00:44 - 00:51]Oliver Tree's show was full of weed smoking and the speaker was feeling sick before attending

[01:58 - 02:08]Oliver Tree is now a DJ and the speaker has a love-hate relationship with him

[01:58 - 02:08]Speaker was brought on stage and humiliated by Oliver Tree during the show

[05:45 - 05:52]Despite the drama, the show was well-produced and the speaker still has love for Oliver Tree

[07:36 - 07:41]Discussion about Oliver Tree's new DJ career and potential new stage name

[09:02 - 09:14]The speaker shares a photo of himself as a cartoon angel battling against demon lollipops

[10:08 - 10:20]Discussion about Catfuls and her defense of drawn cartoon pornography

[10:59 - 11:04]Speaker takes a firm stance against drawn cartoon pornography and sides with adult human pornography

[10:59 - 11:04]Speaker's mind includes all types of fetishes, as long as it is with adults

[00:02 - 11:22]Speaker discusses his damaged voice due to attending Oliver Tree's concert and shares his thoughts on the show and Oliver Tree's new DJ career, as well as his stance against drawn cartoon pornography.

[11:23 - 11:28]Discussing the Venn diagram and the house of gourd

[11:41 - 11:47]Mentioning a bizarre video involving quicksand and mud

[14:16 - 14:27]Previewing a potential content court case

[16:19 - 16:25]Talking about a concert they attended and interacting with fans

[16:19 - 16:25]Mentioning a fan who helped Ela during the concert

[17:28 - 17:33]Discussing the definition of "consenting adult humans"

[17:49 - 17:55]Mentioning a video game where Ethan had sex with a fictional creature

[19:08 - 19:13]Talking about getting a large sticker at the concert

[19:29 - 19:35]Recapping the concert experience and taking a selfie

[20:00 - 20:05]Meeting up with Oliver Tree backstage

[11:23 - 20:05]The audio includes a discussion about the Venn diagram, a bizarre video, a potential content court case, attending a concert and interacting with fans, and meeting up with Oliver Tree backstage.

[20:06 - 29:13]The speaker went to a show and made rude comments about the performers, later apologizing and praising them. He also announced a change in the show's start time and mentioned some updates regarding YouTube memberships and member's content.

[36:33 - 36:45]Content of audio is transcribed to text.

[37:06 - 37:17]Discussion about increase in members and accessibility for European audience.

[37:06 - 37:17]Excitement about upcoming episodes of The Bachelor and Cap Cap's updates.

[37:06 - 37:17]Guest appearance by Ryan and conversation about their previous encounter.

[37:19 - 37:27]Graphical representation of speaking time domination by Ryan.

[37:19 - 37:27]Comparison of Cav Cav's engagement to other popular YouTube channels.

[37:28 - 37:38]Discussion about fans and show statistics.

[37:28 - 37:38]Inclusion of H3 podcast's dislike ratio in the comparison.

[29:14 - 37:51]Summarized text.

[38:43 - 38:56]The speaker and a friend discuss the engagement stats of a Reddit user named Brad the Bull.

[40:04 - 40:10]They wonder if Brad the Bull is actually a friend they used to go to high school with, based on the linguistic similarities in their comments.

[44:30 - 44:38]They also mention a Reddit user with the handle "Wonderful 52" and speculate if it could be the same person.

[45:39 - 45:45]They also find it interesting that both Brad the Bull and the mystery user have left comments on a subreddit for realtors.

[45:39 - 45:45]The mystery user's recent comment on the realtors subreddit sparks a discussion about where the speaker is going.

[45:45 - 45:53]They find it compelling that Brad the Bull uses boomer acronyms on Instagram, and that he and the mystery Reddit user both use "100%" and "because" in their comments.

[46:42 - 46:49]The speaker expresses his dislike for realtors and says that some of them fit a certain stereotype.

[47:38 - 47:44]The speaker mentions an art exhibit featuring Salvador Dali and expresses his desire to not spend any more time with the person they are with.

[37:51 - 47:44]The speaker and a friend discuss the engagement stats and identity of a Reddit user named Brad the Bull, speculating that it could be someone they went to high school with. They also note linguistic similarities in his comments and those of another Reddit user, and find it interesting that both have left comments on a subreddit for realtors. The speaker expresses his dislike for realtors and mentions an upcoming art exhibit featuring Salvador Dali.

[47:52 - 47:57]Albert tells someone to stop buttoning something and mentions clown shenanigans

[47:58 - 48:04]Zach is told to stop and cut it out

[47:58 - 48:04]Albert tries to continue talking but is interrupted by someone named Brad

[49:08 - 49:15]Brad is compared to a character from "Silence of the Lambs"

[51:25 - 51:31]Kev is mentioned and his appearance is criticized

[52:14 - 52:21]HTML errors are found in the comments on Kev's YouTube videos

[54:36 - 54:48]Kev is accused of possibly buying comments and using bots to generate positive comments

[56:43 - 56:49]The possibility of Kev faking his audience is brought up

[47:44 - 56:55]The audio discusses issues with a person named Brad, comments on YouTube videos, and speculates about the intentions of a person named Kev.

[56:55 - 57:01]You, the speaker, have the only one watching.

[57:01 - 57:06]The chat asks if you are real.

[57:06 - 57:17]Thank you to all the members and memberships.

[57:17 - 57:23]If you have YouTube premium, you get a free membership.

[57:24 - 57:30]HTML, SQL, injection is frequent and easy to do.

[57:36 - 57:43]She may be a badass programmer or hacker.

[57:36 - 57:43]You reference the movie "Hackers" and wonder if it's still good.

[58:00 - 58:07]You mention your man and take a sip of a drink.

[58:15 - 58:23]You reference a Ryan cabinet and a camera.

[58:15 - 58:23]You mention a shop and someone named Cam.

[58:29 - 58:34]You apologize for something and mention it's the night before Thanksgiving.

[58:52 - 59:05]You mention a joke and talk about J. Shady's angles.

[58:52 - 59:05]You mention being closer to J. Shady.

[59:28 - 59:36]You mention a commercial with your friend.

[59:48 - 59:55]You talk about a Super Bowl ad and J. Lowe's new movie.

[59:56 - 1.00:02]You mention someone officiating a wedding.

[1.00:26 - 1.00:31]You mention being invited to places and a back tattoo.

[1.00:32 - 1.00:38]You mention social blade stats and losing subs.

[1.00:46 - 1.00:51]You mention an explosive growth in subs and views.

[1.01:07 - 1.01:14]You talk about a screenshot of a YouTube channel.

[1.02:11 - 1.02:25]You talk about following and being followed by the lead singer of Creed.

[1.02:11 - 1.02:25]You mention a video where someone mentions the singer.

[1.02:11 - 1.02:25]You apologize to the singer for something and say you love him.

[1.04:20 - 1.04:26]Speaker mentions being the only one watching and chat questioning their reality.

[1.04:54 - 1.05:00]You mention using one of his songs in a documentary and him allowing it.

[1.05:06 - 1.05:11]You say he's sober and helps others with sobriety.

[1.05:30 - 1.05:37]You invite him to come to your show.

[1.05:30 - 1.05:37]Mention of the movie "Hackers" and a drink.

[1.05:30 - 1.05:37]Reference to a Ryan cabinet and a camera.

[1.05:30 - 1.05:37]Mention of J. Lowe's new movie and officiating a wedding.

[1.05:30 - 1.05:37]Discussion about being invited to places and social blade stats.

[1.05:37 - 1.05:45]You mention a message to the singer. Summary:

[1.05:37 - 1.05:45]Thanking members and mentioning free membership with YouTube premium.

[1.05:37 - 1.05:45]Talk about following and being followed by the lead singer of Creed.

[1.05:37 - 1.05:45]Mention of using one of their songs in a documentary and them allowing it.

[1.05:46 - 1.05:51]Discussion about HTML, SQL, and hacking.

[1.05:46 - 1.05:51]Talk about a screenshot of a YouTube channel and a commercial with a friend.

[1.05:46 - 1.05:51]Discussion about sobriety and inviting the singer to a show.

[56:55 - 1.05:56]A message to the singer.

[1.05:57 - 1.06:03] Rolling Stones, Scott, Snap, and 311 brawl

[1.10:56 - 1.11:05]Description of ideal first date and boundaries in a relationship

[1.11:15 - 1.11:21]Valentine's Day conversation with Gabe, potential Bachelor partnership

[1.11:22 - 1.11:27]Mention of Gabe's cameo and his love for White Claw

[1.12:21 - 1.12:27]Mention of needing to use the bathroom and ordering food

[1.12:41 - 1.12:51]Discussion about 311 and Scott Stapp's sobriety

[1.12:51 - 1.13:11]Discussion of Scott Stapp's past behavior and potential fight with 311

[1.13:38 - 1.13:44]Amber is a colorist, confusion about 311

[1.15:08 - 1.15:14]Creed and 311 song references

[1.15:08 - 1.15:14]Invitation for Scott Stapp to call in and express love for him

[1.05:57 - 1.15:21]End with message of support for Scott Stapp and the Creed band

[1.15:21 - 1.15:26]The audio starts with a discussion about rock music.

[1.16:05 - 1.16:11]They mention a website called "Hurdle" where you have to identify songs by listening to a snippet.

[1.16:29 - 1.16:35]They discuss Taylor Swift and her own version of "Hurdle".

[1.18:03 - 1.18:12]They play the game, but have technical difficulties.

[1.18:22 - 1.18:30]They receive multiple donations during the stream.

[1.18:56 - 1.19:08]They mention a person named Mia who studies genetic epilepsy.

[1.19:14 - 1.19:26]They talk about a previous episode where they discussed murder.

[1.20:22 - 1.20:33]They receive a donation from someone who dislikes Ryan and Brad, but they have a good relationship.

[1.20:49 - 1.20:56]They receive more donations and discuss a potential phone case design.

[1.22:43 - 1.22:52]They briefly mention a call out for a bald spot on Ethan's head.

[1.22:43 - 1.22:52]They move on to discuss a supercut of the podcast.

[1.23:00 - 1.23:12]They address the bald spot and show that it is not actually a bald spot.

[1.23:40 - 1.23:52]They mention a white hair shaming comment.

[1.25:17 - 1.25:34]They briefly show a filter on their camera.

[1.25:54 - 1.26:01]They finally start discussing the main topic of the podcast, Catful.

[1.15:21 - 1.26:01]They talk about the thumbnail and summarize the previous points. Overall, the podcast covers various topics such as music, donations, a potential phone case design, and the main topic of the episode, Catful. They also address a previous call out about a bald spot and show that it is not actually a bald spot.

[1.26:01 - 1.26:30]"Yeah So the catfuls" created a video about the speaker, making tweets and talking about them in live streams.

[1.26:30 - 1.26:37]The catfuls also made a stand on "Lolly Hill," saying they would choose to die there.

[1.26:47 - 1.26:55]The speaker claims that the catfuls said they would defend "Vosh Consumption" of child pornography, specifically drawings.

[1.26:47 - 1.26:55]The speaker compares this to defending Sparta, but instead of defending a city, the catfuls are defending drawn child pornography.

[1.26:47 - 1.26:55]The speaker expresses disbelief and frustration at the existence of a group of people defending drawn child pornography.

[1.26:57 - 1.27:11]The speaker mentions another person, "mr. Girl," who is a self-admitted pedophile and got upset at the speaker's description of him.

[1.28:18 - 1.28:23]The speaker expresses anger at Kefels for inserting Tony into a conversation about child pornography.

[1.28:18 - 1.28:23]The speaker shares their thoughts on Kefels' video, criticizing her chair movements and lack of effort in editing.

[1.30:04 - 1.30:20]The speaker claims that this type of content should not be allowed on YouTube.

[1.30:27 - 1.30:33]The speaker discusses a video by Kefels, who memorializes someone named Tony Winchester and compares the speaker's situation to his.

[1.34:44 - 1.34:52]The speaker mentions their new channel and receiving a donation request for kinetic sand.

[1.35:26 - 1.35:39]Kefels says that the speaker implied that her and tipster are pedophiles and mentions Ethan Klein's involvement in a situation with keemstar.

[1.35:26 - 1.35:39]The speaker mentions Kefels' claims that the speaker and tipster are pedophiles.

[1.35:39 - 1.35:47]The speaker comments on the quality of Ethan Klein's thumbnail.

[1.35:47 - 1.35:56]The speaker criticizes Kefels' use of Tony's memory in the video.

[1.35:56 - 1.36:02]The speaker expresses disbelief at the lack of effort put into Kefels' video, calling it a "content fizzle."

[1.36:25 - 1.36:35]The speaker mentions a previous collaboration with Ian's ghost writer and freelance work.

[1.36:35 - 1.36:41]The speaker shares their thoughts on Kefels' chair movements and editing.

[1.36:35 - 1.36:41]The speaker mentions their new channel and donation request.

[1.36:35 - 1.36:41]The speaker discusses Kefels' comparison of their situation to Ethan Klein's involvement with keemstar.

[1.36:35 - 1.36:41]The speaker criticizes Kefels' thumbnail and lack of effort in the video.

[1.36:35 - 1.36:41]The speaker expresses disbelief at the lack of effort put into the video and calls it a "content fizzle."

[1.26:01 - 1.36:41]The speaker expresses their frustration and disbelief at Kefels' video about them, criticizing her use of Tony's memory and her claims that the speaker and tipster are pedophiles. They also express frustration at the lack of effort put into the video and share their thoughts on Kefels' chair movements and editing. The speaker also mentions their new channel and donation request, and discusses Kefels' comparison of their situation to Ethan Klein's involvement with keemstar.

[1.36:42 - 1.47:05]The conversation starts with a discussion about Ian's ghost writer and giving credit for a controversial video with 8.3 million views. Keemstar is mentioned for falsely accusing a Twitch streamer of being a pedophile, and his relationship with Tony Winchester is brought up. The planning of a video about Edica and heavy issues is discussed, as well as the mature rating it received and the views it received. Keemstar's false accusations and lack of evidence are mentioned, along with Ethan and Ian's suspicions about his motives. The topic of Vosh's drawings and statements is brought up, as well as Ethan's evidence against him and his suspicions about those defending Vosh. Ethan responds to accusations about his motives and making money, and talks about the difficulty of discussing this topic on social media. Donations and memberships are received during the podcast, and there is a running joke about making money from the topic. Jessica is mentioned for her donation and support, and there is a call for people to buy the money suit from Jaggi. Ethan asks Kefel's to keep track of donations and memberships, and questions what happened to the old Ethan who stood up for Tony Winchester.

[1.47:05 - 1.47:19]H3H3 is trying to de-escalate a conflict and cares about the people involved

[1.47:19 - 1.47:27]He wants to avoid online "blood sports"

[1.47:19 - 1.47:27]It is mentioned that H3H3 is in the "bloody business"

[1.47:30 - 1.47:48]Someone defends animated CP and H3H3 is accused of defamation

[1.48:42 - 1.48:57]Kefla is mentioned and criticized for not understanding sarcasm

[1.48:58 - 1.49:29]H3H3 jokes about being sued for defamation and would win the case

[1.51:16 - 1.51:21]Contrapoints is defended and praised for her intelligence and research skills

[1.51:37 - 1.51:51]H3H3 is accused of defending Vash's consumption of childlike sexual images

[1.53:24 - 1.53:32]The overall conversation is confusing and frustrating

[1.54:25 - 1.54:40]Keemstar is mentioned and criticized for defending Vash

[1.55:20 - 1.55:26]Keemstar is accused of using false allegations of pedophilia against H3H3

[1.56:29 - 1.56:37]H3H3 is accused of transphobia and grooming children

[1.47:05 - 1.56:37]H3H3's main point is that false allegations of pedophilia and transphobia are harmful and should not be used

[1.56:37 - 1.57:17] ContraPoints called out the speaker on Twitter and blocked him, despite no public interaction between them.

[1.58:17 - 1.58:31]The speaker accuses ContraPoints of falsely labeling him as a pedophile.

[2.03:59 - 2.04:17]ContraPoints continues to accuse the speaker of being a pedophile and shows a clip that supports her claim.

[2.03:59 - 2.04:17]The speaker argues that the clip was taken out of context and provides further explanation.

[2.03:59 - 2.04:17]The speaker and ContraPoints go back and forth, with the speaker defending himself and ContraPoints accusing him of supporting pedophilia.

[2.03:59 - 2.04:17]The speaker and his co-hosts discuss the situation and provide evidence that they did not take the clip out of context.

[2.04:17 - 2.04:22]The speaker defends himself by saying his statements were taken out of context.

[2.05:20 - 2.05:30]The speaker argues that possession of certain media (such as child pornography) should not be illegal.

[2.05:30 - 2.05:47]The speaker clarifies his stance and explains that he does not condone or support the production of such media.

[1.56:37 - 2.06:53]In conclusion, the speaker and ContraPoints have a disagreement over the speaker's stance on the possession of certain media, with ContraPoints accusing him of supporting pedophilia and the speaker defending himself and providing further explanation.

[2.08:16 - 2.08:29] Audio features individuals discussing a podcast and defending controversial statements

[2.09:38 - 2.10:06]They accuse someone else of lying and defending drawn child pornography

[2.10:39 - 2.10:52]They claim to have provided full context for their controversial statements

[2.12:14 - 2.13:07]They discuss the difference between act and rule utilitarianism

[2.14:54 - 2.15:01]They believe that the other person is lying or ignorant about the situation

[2.15:17 - 2.15:30]The audio ends with the individuals insulting and dismissing the other person's arguments

[2.15:59 - 2.16:15]They argue about the morality and legality of possessing child pornography

[2.16:32 - 2.16:45]They show the full context of their controversial statements, but it does not change their argument

[2.06:54 - 2.16:45]Individuals defend their controversial statements and accuse someone else of lying and defending drawn child pornography, while discussing the morality and legality of possessing child pornography and the difference between act and rule utilitarianism. They provide full context for their statements but it does not change their argument and they dismiss the other person's arguments as ignorant.

[2.16:45 - 2.17:17]Vash is mad because they didn't show how much he's talked about CP

[2.18:08 - 2.18:15]Ethan didn't show the numerous times Vash talked about how CP is bad

[2.18:08 - 2.18:15]Ethan didn't show the times Vash lied and denied being into CP

[2.18:08 - 2.18:15]Ethan and Dan did not show all the other times Vash talked about CP

[2.18:15 - 2.18:24]Vash compared CP to child labor and said it should be considered immoral

[2.18:25 - 2.18:31]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash talking about CP

[2.19:00 - 2.19:18]Ethan didn't make his arguments well in the debate

[2.19:59 - 2.20:12]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash talking about how CP is connected to being attracted to children

[2.20:13 - 2.20:27]Ethan didn't show every single time Vash talked about CP

[2.20:27 - 2.20:42]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash talking about how everyone has "jerked it" to lolly

[2.21:30 - 2.21:55]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash talking about CP and compared it to the "all lives matter" argument

[2.21:30 - 2.21:55]Vash's defense is being disregarded because he is a lolly consumer

[2.22:37 - 2.22:53]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash talking about saving images in a "to be sorted" folder

[2.22:53 - 2.23:03]Vash and Ethan discussed the "vegan gains debate"

[2.23:04 - 2.23:32]Vash explains that the images in the folder were mostly pornographic and non-pornographic images of characters from different sources

[2.23:32 - 2.23:40]Ethan and Dan laughed at Vash's response and found it ridiculous

[2.23:57 - 2.24:05]Vash's response is that the images were saved in a "to be sorted" folder and were not intentionally saved for personal use

[2.24:05 - 2.24:23]Vash saved an image from a lolly artist, but it did not look like lolly

[2.24:29 - 2.24:34]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash responding to the news about lolly

[2.24:29 - 2.24:34]Ethan and Dan watched Vash's response to the accusation of having lolly images

[2.24:29 - 2.24:34]Ethan and Dan watched the video of Vash explaining the situation and defending himself

[2.24:34 - 2.24:40]Vash did not intentionally save the lolly images and rejects the idea that he is at fault

[2.24:40 - 2.24:48]Ethan and Dan reject the idea that Vash is at fault for having the image in the folder because it did not look like lolly

[2.24:40 - 2.24:48]Ethan and Dan found Vash's response to be reasonable and reject the accusation that he is a lolly consumer

[2.16:45 - 2.24:48]In summary, Ethan and Dan watched several videos of Vash talking about CP and the accusation of being a lolly consumer, but reject the idea that he is at fault.

[2.26:39 - 2.26:48] Ethan and someone named Kefos discuss a video made by someone who accused them of sharing Drawn CP.

[2.29:02 - 2.29:07]Ethan defends himself saying he didn't know anything about it and it was just mentioned to them by Keemstar.

[2.32:24 - 2.32:36]Kefos shows a tweet from Chris where he mentions being a fan of the artist.

[2.33:39 - 2.33:47]Ethan and Kefos discuss the artist being in jail for assault with a deadly weapon.

[2.34:02 - 2.34:16]Kefos accuses Ethan of defending Vash, a person who has been accused of consuming drawn CP.

[2.34:02 - 2.34:16]Ethan defends himself saying he has a good relationship with a person named Chris who is accused of being friends with a lollicon artist.

[2.34:02 - 2.34:16]Ethan dismisses the tweet, saying he has spoken with Chris and does not believe he would support such content.

[2.34:31 - 2.34:38]Ethan mentions that the accusations are beneficial for Ethan to attack Vash.

[2.34:59 - 2.35:06]Ethan points out the contradictions in the accuser's arguments.

[2.35:06 - 2.35:31]Kefos continues to accuse Ethan of defending Vash and not taking the accusations seriously.

[2.35:06 - 2.35:31]Ethan and Kefos discuss whether the artist has acknowledged the allegations.

[2.35:40 - 2.35:45]Ethan defends himself by saying he is not familiar with the situation and it is gross.

[2.35:40 - 2.35:45]Ethan concludes by saying it is gross and he is not familiar with the situation.

[2.24:50 - 2.35:45]Ethan defends himself against accusations of defending Vash and not taking the allegations seriously, reiterating that he does not support CP in any form.

[2.37:33 - 2.37:48] Keffles criticizes Chris for consuming CP once 6 years ago and argues that she may have learned from it and no longer engages in that behavior

[2.37:48 - 2.37:54]She claims that the problem with Vash is that he has consumed CP multiple times, not just once like Chris

[2.40:46 - 2.40:51]Ethan and Hila discuss the difference between Chris and Vash's actions and how it relates to their platform sizes

[2.43:31 - 2.43:43]Keffles accuses Ethan of being a hypocrite for not going after Mr. Beast, who employs Chris

[2.44:20 - 2.44:34]Ethan argues that Mr. Beast's controversies have been relatively tame and forgivable

[2.45:33 - 2.45:49]Keffles claims that Ethan is selectively outraged and only goes after low-hanging fruit like Vash

[2.45:49 - 2.45:57]Ethan argues that Vash is a large content creator who can defend himself and that he has criticized Mr. Beast in the past

[2.35:46 - 2.45:57]Keffles criticizes Ethan for being a hypocrite in his handling of Chris, who consumed CP once 6 years ago, and Vash, who has consumed it multiple times. Ethan argues that Mr. Beast's controversies are minor compared to Vash's actions and that Vash is a large content creator who can defend himself.

[2.45:57 - 2.46:21] The conversation is about a smart and articulate guy known for debate.

[2.50:38 - 2.50:47]They discuss a restaurant named Edaly and whether or not to go there.

[2.50:47 - 2.50:56]The discussion turns to pizza and the difference between authentic Italian pizza and American pizza.

[2.51:30 - 2.51:40]The conversation moves to discussing a donation from someone named Bizarro.

[2.52:47 - 2.52:56]One person makes a comment about selective moral outrage.

[2.52:57 - 2.53:10]They mention Teddy Fresh and a controversy surrounding a sweater with watermelon on it.

[2.53:20 - 2.53:27]They debate the merits of watermelon vs. other fruits like cherries and bananas.

[2.54:55 - 2.55:05]The conversation ends with a comment about enjoying watermelon with Spanish cheese at the beach.

[2.45:57 - 2.55:27]The conversation covers topics such as a smart and articulate guy, selective moral outrage, donations, pizza, and a controversy surrounding a sweater from Teddy Fresh.

[2.56:13 - 2.56:28]Speaker discusses putting mayo on watermelon and salad

[2.56:29 - 2.56:40]They mention it being a southern thing

[2.56:29 - 2.56:40]They also talk about visiting a berry farm and eating fresh berries

[2.56:55 - 2.57:00]Speaker brings up the topic of child abuse and mentions a clothing brand called Teddy Fresh

[2.59:00 - 2.59:20]Speaker looks into one of the auditors, RAP, and mentions criticism against them for undermining local labor rights organizations

[3.00:24 - 3.00:36]They discuss how the brand claims to have ethical labor practices and use third-party auditors

[3.00:24 - 3.00:36]They mention a different auditor, BSCI, and say they only did a cursory glance into their practices

[3.02:43 - 3.02:55]Speaker accuses Teddy Fresh of using child labor and participating in the consumption of CP

[3.03:52 - 3.04:06]They bring up a photo of Teddy Fresh's owner holding a rifle in their IDF uniform

[3.04:14 - 3.04:21]Speaker calls out the hypocrisy of accusing others of wrongdoing while also engaging in it

[3.05:17 - 3.05:23]They mention a cartoon character that changes ages in the show, causing confusion over their age

[3.05:30 - 3.05:41]The speaker clarifies that they were talking about drawn CP, not actual children

[2.55:27 - 3.06:06]Speaker discusses putting mayo on watermelon and salad, visits a berry farm, and then brings up the topic of child abuse and a clothing brand called Teddy Fresh. They accuse the brand of using child labor and participating in the consumption of CP, and also mention a photo of the owner holding a rifle. They clarify their stance on drawn CP and call out the hypocrisy of accusing others while engaging in similar behaviors.

[3.06:06 - 3.06:20] The page_content contains a conversation about a character named Lolly from a show.

[3.07:00 - 3.07:05]The speakers pull up images of the character and discuss her appearance.

[3.08:59 - 3.09:07]They also mention another character named Cora and her significance.

[3.11:33 - 3.11:41]The conversation turns to the political and economic state of the world.

[3.11:33 - 3.11:41]They consider ending the show early, but continue discussing various topics.

[3.11:41 - 3.11:50]The topic switches to a person named Bevo and updates about them.

[3.12:15 - 3.12:21]The show will resume on Monday at 12 PM.

[3.15:04 - 3.15:31]The conversation contains mentions of standing against cp and being cancelled.

[3.15:38 - 3.16:05]The speakers thank their supporters and mention a possible free membership offer.

[3.06:06 - 3.16:05]Overall, the conversation covers various topics such as characters from a show, the state of the world, and updates on a person named Bevo.