[00:16 - 01:59]The hosts are introducing themselves and discussing the controversial topic of Ludwig's algorithm.

[01:14 - 03:24]The hosts talk about XQC's music and his collaboration with other content creators.

[03:04 - 04:20]XQC says he doesn't care about drama and is focused on content.

[03:25 - 05:05]They discuss XQC's behavior online and in person.

[04:02 - 06:40]The hosts are introducing themselves and discussing the controversial topic of Ludwig's algorithm.

[05:12 - 07:38]XQC is a guest on the show and they discuss his persona and how it affects his personal life.

[07:39 - 10:09]Luffy and XQC have a discussion about how they treat others and XQC's belief in treating others how you want to be treated.

[10:12 - 11:35]They discuss XQC's behavior online and in person.

[11:01 - 11:35]They mention how things are slower in real life compared to the internet.

[11:35 - 12:09]XQC talks about being an artist and what kind of art he would like to create.

[11:35 - 12:40]The speaker mentions watching Andy Kaufman, who also had a similar sensibility of agitating people.

[11:45 - 11:54]The speaker talks about understanding the consequences of their actions and how smaller content creators may not be able to handle it.

[12:18 - 12:29]They discuss instigating and getting a rise out of people.

[12:40 - 13:48]They clarify that they don't want to agitate people, but rather have consensual drama.

[13:15 - 15:16]The speaker talks about understanding the consequences of their actions and how smaller content creators may not be able to handle it.

[15:16 - 15:47]The speaker talks about their tendency to get consumed and go all in.

[15:47 - 16:39]The speaker mentions watching Andy Kaufman, who also had a similar sensibility of agitating people.

[15:53 - 17:38]They discuss how they've always enjoyed being a troll since they were young, particularly in the gaming space.

[16:14 - 16:31]The speaker talks about their tendency to get consumed and go all in.

[17:13 - 17:32]The speaker mentions a specific incident where they were playing Valorant and got toxic towards the other players.

[17:21 - 18:54]The speaker talks about getting mad at people and giving them too many chances in real life.

[18:02 - 19:39]The speaker mentions a specific incident where they were playing Valorant and got toxic towards the other players.

[18:25 - 18:35]They clarify that they don't want to agitate people, but rather have consensual drama.

[18:35 - 19:34]The speaker talks about their tendency to get consumed and go all in.

[19:40 - 21:04]The speaker predicts that as the internet becomes more akin to real life, people will become kinder due to the potential repercussions.

[21:04 - 21:47]They then discuss a hypothetical 2v2v1 situation, with the speaker claiming they would still win.

[21:33 - 23:08]The conversation turns to competitive sports, with the speaker describing how they would mess with opponents on the field.

[22:04 - 23:14]The topic shifts to online gaming and how the speaker used to be more competitive and "annoying" in games like GTA.

[22:32 - 24:10]They mention a specific incident where they were tackled and threatened, but the opponent got a red card and the speaker's team won.

[22:55 - 23:35]The conversation turns to competitive sports, with the speaker describing how they would mess with opponents on the field.

[23:36 - 23:51]The speaker discusses a situation where someone was called a rat and a snake, and how it led to a 3v2 win in a game.

[24:10 - 25:23]The topic shifts to online gaming and how the speaker used to be more competitive and "annoying" in games like GTA.

[24:58 - 25:09]The conversation turns to competitive sports, with the speaker describing how they would mess with opponents on the field.

[25:23 - 26:07]The conversation ends with the speaker discussing how smaller content creators may behave differently if they were in a position of power.

[26:09 - 27:06]The speaker mentions that being at the top comes with a responsibility not to harm others, and that this behavior can negatively impact content and relationships.

[27:07 - 27:39]The conversation ends with the speaker discussing how smaller content creators may behave differently if they were in a position of power.

[27:40 - 28:06]They also mention the idea of "punching down" in terms of power dynamics, and how the speaker carries themselves differently as a larger content creator.

[28:07 - 28:43]The conversation ends with the speaker discussing how smaller content creators may behave differently if they were in a position of power.

[28:12 - 28:43]They mention that Pokemon also faces similar criticisms from someone named XUC.

[28:44 - 28:49]The conversation turns to competitive sports, with the speaker describing how they would mess with opponents on the field.

[28:44 - 29:14]The speaker talks about their own tendency to make controversial statements and how it can perpetuate memes and stereotypes.

[29:14 - 30:53]They express frustration with people believing these statements despite them not being true.

[29:20 - 30:27]The speaker mentions how this can affect their personal relationships and how they handle seeking permission versus seeking forgiveness.

[30:28 - 31:05]The speaker talks about their own tendency to make controversial statements and how it can perpetuate memes and stereotypes.

[31:05 - 31:23]They bring up a specific example of being labeled as the "Pepe Pain's guy" and how it has stuck with them.

[31:23 - 32:20]The speaker talks about their own tendency to make controversial statements and how it can perpetuate memes and stereotypes.

[31:40 - 32:28]They mention how they have addressed false accusations about themselves, even if it is from someone they have a personal relationship with.

[31:57 - 33:30]The speaker talks about their own tendency to make controversial statements and how it can perpetuate memes and stereotypes.

[33:04 - 33:17]The speaker discusses the trend of people misinterpreting and misconstruing their statements for views.

[33:30 - 34:01]The speaker talks about how their community can cultivate hate and how it can tarnish their brand, even if it is manufactured drama.

[34:01 - 34:44]They mention examples of this, such as a house, car, and clothing purchase, and how it can be perceived differently for different streamers.

[34:09 - 35:02]The speaker discusses the trend of people misinterpreting and misconstruing their statements for views.

[35:02 - 35:31]The speaker brings up the controversial statement that it is partially acceptable to make fun of streamers since they are all millionaires.

[35:31 - 36:20]They mention a situation where they opened a door a little bit, knowing there was a "fire" (potentially a controversial topic) inside

[36:20 - 36:38]They acknowledge that sometimes they do things that are wrong, but they don't always realize it until later

[36:38 - 37:45]They discuss a specific situation where they went too hard and acknowledges that it was not productive

[37:03 - 37:32]They admit to having bad intentions and going too far in certain situations

[37:10 - 38:23]They discuss a specific situation where they went too hard and acknowledges that it was not productive

[37:45 - 37:53]They admit to having bad intentions and going too far in certain situations

[38:01 - 39:27]They mention using clips of someone out of context and apologize for it

[38:23 - 40:30]They discuss a specific situation where they went too hard and acknowledges that it was not productive

[39:36 - 40:39]They mention a conversation about being a bad friend and not reaching out to people beforehand

[39:54 - 41:27]They discuss a specific situation where they went too hard and acknowledges that it was not productive

[41:27 - 42:17]They discuss a situation where they put someone in a difficult position and acknowledge that it was not intentional

[42:17 - 42:22]They mention a specific incident where they did something inappropriate and apologized for it, but acknowledge that it was still bad

[42:24 - 43:22]They discuss a situation where they put someone in a difficult position and acknowledge that it was not intentional

[42:30 - 42:47]They mention a conversation about being a bad friend and not reaching out to people beforehand

[43:22 - 44:57]They mention that ignoring the situation is worse than apologizing and acknowledging their mistake

[43:29 - 44:05]They mention trying to improve and apologize when they realize they were wrong

[44:10 - 44:48]They discuss potential "exit ramps" in a difficult situation, such as reaching out to the person involved or apologizing publicly

[44:57 - 45:11]The speaker acknowledges that the people they deal with are real human beings and have flaws.

[45:11 - 46:18]Due to their large audience and influence, people treat the speaker with special treatment.

[45:18 - 45:35]The speaker admits to deliberately making people feel bad and manipulating their young audience.

[45:36 - 45:53]The conversation ends with the speaker reflecting on their past actions and choosing to not make certain jokes anymore.

[46:18 - 46:42]The speaker admits to deliberately making people feel bad and manipulating their young audience.

[46:42 - 47:07]The other person calls out the speaker for not addressing their problematic behavior on camera.

[47:09 - 47:47]The conversation ends with the speaker reflecting on their past actions and choosing to not make certain jokes anymore.

[47:47 - 49:12]The speaker and the other person discuss their past friendship and why it fell apart.

[49:12 - 51:20]The other person calls out the speaker for not addressing their problematic behavior on camera.

[49:19 - 52:16]The speaker and the other person discuss their past friendship and why it fell apart.

[51:21 - 52:09]Due to their large audience and influence, people treat the speaker with special treatment.

[51:36 - 52:39]The other person in the conversation expresses frustration with the speaker's behavior and how their audience defends them.

[52:39 - 53:35]The other person calls out the speaker for not addressing their problematic behavior on camera.

[53:35 - 54:23]The conversation shifts to discussing a recent event where the speaker's community turned against them.

[54:24 - 54:32]The conversation ends with the speaker reflecting on their past actions and choosing to not make certain jokes anymore.