[00:12 - 00:22] It is February 9th, 2024 and the group is discussing a funny slam on Gary V.

[01:09 - 01:18]They joke about needing to unfollow him and mention a deadline for bachelor applications.

[04:12 - 04:18]They talk about their kids' favorite YouTubers and make a joke about Blippi's controversial past.

[06:21 - 06:27]They discuss Taylor Swift's participation in the Grammys and her snub of Celine Dion, who has stiff person syndrome.

[06:49 - 06:55]They invent a new slur, "stiffy," in reference to Celine's condition.

[08:30 - 08:36]They mention their love for both Taylor Swift and Celine Dion, with Celine being their favorite album and concert.

[00:01 - 08:48]The group discusses funny slams on Gary V, their kids' favorite YouTubers, and the Taylor Swift and Celine Dion drama at the Grammys. They also mention the deadline for bachelor applications and invent a new slur for Celine's condition.

[08:48 - 08:55]Discussion about Celine Dion and Taylor Swift

[09:13 - 09:24]Taylor Swift bringing her friend Lana Del Rey on stage at an award show

[10:39 - 10:45]The hosts expressing their discomfort with the concept of "spicy folders"

[11:19 - 11:35]Vash, a political streamer, accidentally opening his "spicy folder" on stream

[12:39 - 12:44]The folder containing drawings of horse cocks and a genre of hentai called "loli"

[13:17 - 13:27]A poll asking if anyone in the audience has a spicy folder, with a small percentage saying yes

[13:17 - 13:27]Discussion about the cultural acceptance of spicy folders and the hosts' personal views on watching porn

[16:07 - 16:15]The hosts clarifying that the poll may include personal photos and not just spicy content

[08:48 - 17:25]A final bullet point summarizing the entire conversation about spicy folders, Taylor Swift, and Vash's controversial content.

[22:39 - 22:59] Started new drop schedule in which they would release items daily instead of all at once

[24:34 - 24:45]Received backlash from customers about increased shipping costs

[25:00 - 25:18]Decided to roll back the new drop schedule and offer free shipping on all U.S. domestic orders until end of month

[25:51 - 25:57]People were begging them not to do this, including their accountant

[26:04 - 26:13]Offered refunds for shipping costs to those who had already purchased items this month

[26:42 - 26:48]This was not a cash grab, it was simply an experiment that received feedback

[26:48 - 26:56]They have been doing monthly drops for 6-7 years and love doing it

[17:26 - 26:56]The page_content describes the hosts' decision to change their drop schedule for their clothing brand Teddy Fresh, offering daily releases instead of monthly ones. However, they received backlash from customers about increased shipping costs and ultimately decided to roll back the new schedule and offer free shipping on all U.S. domestic orders until the end of the month. This decision was met with resistance from their accountant, but the hosts maintain that it was not a cash grab and they have been doing monthly drops for several years.

[26:57 - 27:02] The speaker discusses how they have different shipping schedules, sometimes twice per month and other times once per month.

[27:09 - 27:15]They acknowledge that some people were passionately against the shipping schedule and appreciate their customers' loyalty and care.

[27:23 - 27:29]The speaker talks about the importance of having a two-way relationship with their customers and showing them that they care.

[27:37 - 27:47]The speaker gets annoyed that all the comments were about shipping instead of the new collection.

[27:54 - 27:59]They introduce the February collection and show off some of the new items, including a bike jersey and a modular jacket.

[28:52 - 28:58]They mention that they may not make a lot of money this month due to their shipping decisions, but it doesn't matter to them.

[28:52 - 28:58]The speaker discusses the decision to offer free shipping for all orders to the end of the month, despite potential financial losses.

[30:15 - 30:22]They mention that the decision to offer free shipping is a way to combat rising costs and prices in the industry.

[30:40 - 30:46]The speaker wonders if they should lower their shipping bar in the future and considers the potential impact on their profits.

[33:48 - 33:54]The speaker discusses their shipping decisions and showcases new items from the February collection, including free shipping.

[34:14 - 34:19]The speaker expresses concern for their Legos and checks their cameras at home.

[34:20 - 34:25]They receive an earthquake during the conversation and discuss safety protocols and earthquake-resistant architecture in California.

[34:33 - 34:38]They mention that large earthquakes are terrifying and can make one feel small and helpless.

[35:06 - 35:12]The conversation ends with the speaker asking if everyone is okay and mentioning a previous traumatic earthquake experience.

[26:57 - 35:19]The speaker discusses shipping schedules and customer loyalty, introduces the February collection and showcases new items, and considers the impact of free shipping on profits. They also experience an earthquake during the conversation and discuss safety protocols and previous traumatic experiences.

[35:25 - 35:30] The speaker discusses a major earthquake in their life, the 1994 North Ridge earthquake in Ventura.

[35:31 - 35:37]They were living in West Valley at the time and their house was damaged, causing them to move out for a year.

[35:56 - 36:02]The speaker's parents had insurance and were able to fix the foundation of their house.

[36:09 - 36:17]The speaker mentions that earthquake insurance is expensive in Los Angeles.

[36:40 - 36:48]They discuss the potential for harm in developing countries with less earthquake-resistant infrastructure.

[37:27 - 37:37]The speaker's aunt used to live in a "dingbat" apartment, a common type of apartment in Southern California that was reinforced after the North Ridge earthquake.

[40:06 - 40:15]They mention a recent drop in their clothing line, Teddy Fresh, and a customer's criticism about shipping costs.

[40:06 - 40:15]The speaker and their co-host joke about their success and mention changing their release schedule and offering free shipping.

[40:38 - 40:45]The speaker mentions that they do not make money off of shipping and cannot control the cost.

[43:03 - 43:18]They thank their sponsor, Shopify, and discuss how easy it is to use their platform for their business.

[35:19 - 44:19]In conclusion, the speaker discusses their relationship with Shopify and the success of their clothing line.

[44:20 - 44:33]Shopify is recommended for turning browsers into buyers with a high converting checkout

[44:41 - 44:52]The hosts encourage listeners to consider trying Shopify for their own business

[45:24 - 45:32]A listener named Heidi confirms her pregnancy and the hosts congratulate her

[48:51 - 48:57]The hosts discuss their previous experience with giving birth, with Ela almost giving birth in the toilet

[49:54 - 49:59]They plan for a faster birth this time and discuss options for childcare during the birth

[51:35 - 51:52]The hosts discuss a tribute video made by a listener, featuring clips from previous episodes

[51:52 - 51:58]Final thoughts and congratulations to the guests for their success

[52:04 - 52:13]They introduce their guests, Bryce Hall and Brad the Bull Basket, and discuss their popularity and fame

[52:38 - 52:43]The guests discuss their experiences with cyberbullying in high school

[52:38 - 52:43]The hosts and guests discuss the influence of social media on youth and their own online presence

[44:20 - 52:50]The hosts discuss Shopify, congratulate a pregnant listener, and have guests share their experiences with cyberbullying and social media influence.

[52:50 - 52:56]Audio begins with someone insulting the listener and commenting on their weight.

[53:29 - 53:34]They discuss 9/11 and the listener's nickname "the bull" possibly stemming from never giving up.

[54:35 - 54:43]Mention of a failed marriage leading to a strong brotherly bond.

[56:50 - 57:01]Accusation of fake reviews on a podcast, with evidence provided.

[58:30 - 58:40]Confusion over a podcast episode having more likes than views.

[59:12 - 59:21]Mention of the listener buying 2000 likes for a podcast episode.

[1.01:27 - 1.01:32]The hosts reach out to a YouTube expert for an explanation.

[1.01:41 - 1.01:47]The show does not want to risk getting banned.

[52:50 - 1.01:55]Audio discusses insults, 9/11, a failed marriage, and accusations of fake reviews and bought likes on a podcast. Confusion arises over a podcast episode having more likes than views, and the hosts seek an explanation from a YouTube expert.

[1.01:55 - 1.02:03]Boy Nigel Lithgow mentioned in episode three

[1.02:04 - 1.02:10]7,300 likes and 9,000 views on Nigel's episode

[1.02:40 - 1.02:46]Kevin Smith talks about investing with Ryan Kavanaugh on his podcast in 2011

[1.03:43 - 1.03:51]Kevin Smith warns against investing with Ryan Kavanaugh in the movie business

[1.06:29 - 1.06:35]Girl math and boy math discussed

[1.07:43 - 1.07:53]Possible undercover Brad the Bull commenter on a post about him

[1.08:40 - 1.08:48]The group has no ill will towards Brad or Ryan's ex-wife

[1.09:32 - 1.09:39]Commenter shares personal and specific information about Brad and Ryan's relationship

[1.10:21 - 1.10:26]Making fun of Brad and Ryan's relationship due to their differences in appearance

[1.01:55 - 1.10:39]The group discusses Nigel Lithgow, Kevin Smith's warning about investing with Ryan Kavanaugh, girl and boy math, and a possible undercover commenter revealing personal information about Brad and Ryan's relationship. They clarify that they have no ill will towards Brad or Ryan's ex-wife and are simply making fun of their relationship.

[1.10:44 - 1.10:50] The speaker discusses a person named Ryan who was popular in high school and eventually became captain of a team.

[1.10:51 - 1.11:02]The speaker mentions avoiding insulting or going after Ryan's wife or ex-wife and his friend Brad.

[1.12:35 - 1.12:44]The speaker and Zach discuss Ryan and Brad's physical similarities and Ryan's obsession with high school popularity.

[1.13:42 - 1.14:01]The speaker clarifies that he has nothing against Ryan's wife or ex-wife and has empathy for them.

[1.15:46 - 1.15:58]The speaker acknowledges that his comments about Ryan's wife may come off as chauvinistic and discusses finding a better way to emphasize Ryan's humiliation.

[1.15:58 - 1.16:05]The speaker expresses happiness for Ryan's wife and her fulfillment in her relationship with Brad.

[1.17:15 - 1.17:24]The speaker and Zach discuss Ryan and Brad's fashion choices and wealth, with the speaker noting that Brad is more successful and has more substance.

[1.10:39 - 1.19:10]Overall, the speaker discusses Ryan and his relationships, acknowledging potential chauvinism and commenting on Ryan's success and personality.

[1.24:38 - 1.24:43] Brad and Ryan were discussing a woman before being interrupted by a photo of her.

[1.25:06 - 1.25:12]They comment on how great she looks with someone else and her agency in the photo.

[1.25:06 - 1.25:12]They then discuss a photo with Jay Shetty and Darman, wondering about the context and if they are realtors.

[1.25:06 - 1.25:12]They also mention how Shetty is always present and known for being successful.

[1.25:22 - 1.25:27]They mention how Brad manages talent and possibly sold a podcast to Shetty.

[1.25:34 - 1.25:41]They critique Shetty's yellow shirt.

[1.25:34 - 1.25:41]They discuss Brad's knowledge about Ryan's ex-wife and her new boyfriend.

[1.25:34 - 1.25:41]They question why Brad knows so much and speculate it could be Ryan or Brad commenting on Brad's own post.

[1.26:04 - 1.26:10]They mention Bryce's positive comments about Brad.

[1.26:04 - 1.26:10]They question who could be commenting and suggest it could be Bryce or someone trying to sound young.

[1.26:33 - 1.26:40]They continue to discuss the photo and speculate about a neon theme.

[1.26:33 - 1.26:40]They speculate that the commenter could be Jessica, the ex-wife, before concluding that it is likely not her.

[1.26:45 - 1.26:52]They mention Ryan's use of the word "uplink" and how it may not be current slang.

[1.19:11 - 1.27:12]Brad and Ryan discuss photos of a woman and her new boyfriend, as well as a photo with Jay Shetty and Darman. They also critique Shetty's outfit and speculate about a possible neon theme at the event. They mention Brad's talent management and knowledge about Ryan's ex-wife's new boyfriend, and question who could be commenting on Brad's post with intimate knowledge of the situation. They consider the possibility of it being Jessica, but ultimately conclude that it is likely not her or Bryce.

[1.27:13 - 1.27:18] Someone doesn't see something and mentions it being the least cringy

[1.27:18 - 1.27:24]They don't see a person saying things and believe she is a queen who is always closing

[1.27:24 - 1.27:31]They discuss the name "always closing" being patronizing and weird

[1.27:37 - 1.27:46]They think it's weird to take it from a movie about scumbag salesmen

[1.27:52 - 1.27:58]They mention there being more to the story and a "fucking guy"

[1.28:06 - 1.28:11]They mention a possible obvious answer being the wife

[1.28:41 - 1.28:49]They mention a user being called out for knowing a lot about Brad and his friend Ryan

[1.31:15 - 1.31:21]They discuss the wife being the funniest answer and the nanny being a wild card guess

[1.31:54 - 1.32:04]They discuss the user's post history being mainly about Brad and their subreddit

[1.32:17 - 1.32:27]They question the credibility of the story and wonder if it was written by Brad himself

[1.33:44 - 1.33:54]They mention a possible cover story for how the user knows so much about Brad

[1.27:13 - 1.35:43]A comprehensive summary of the discussion and speculations about a person named Brad and his friends, as well as a user who seems to know a lot about them.

[1.35:49 - 1.35:56] The speaker makes comments about a company and how someone would know about it.

[1.36:43 - 1.36:50]They discuss how someone would know about the length of a friendship.

[1.36:43 - 1.36:50]The speaker brings up that someone said they weren't friends in high school, and that this was discussed on a podcast.

[1.37:08 - 1.37:14]They question the validity of this person's claims and speculate on their identity.

[1.37:08 - 1.37:14]The conversation shifts to discussing a person named Brad and their possible involvement.

[1.37:46 - 1.37:51]The speaker talks about how Brad may have insecurities despite seeming successful.

[1.41:01 - 1.41:07]Gabe discusses a cake and the earthquake again.

[1.42:51 - 1.42:57]They mention an earthquake that happened earlier and discuss dinosaurs.

[1.44:17 - 1.44:22]The speaker apologizes for possibly missing part of the conversation.

[1.44:36 - 1.44:41]Ethan did not receive any cake.

[1.35:43 - 1.44:41]Overall, the conversation includes discussions about a company, the length of a friendship, high school memories, and speculation about a person's identity. They also briefly mention an earthquake and dinosaurs.

[1.44:51 - 1.44:56]A conversation about content frequency and margin for error

[1.45:37 - 1.45:42]Gabe being ready for war and finding a story about cake funny

[1.46:47 - 1.46:52]Taylor Kelsey's dating life and surprise that he's dating Taylor Swift

[1.47:06 - 1.47:11]Discussion about the Super Bowl and rooting for the Chiefs

[1.47:41 - 1.47:47]Speculation about the Super Bowl halftime performance and Usher's age

[1.49:22 - 1.49:33]Gabe's love and appreciation for the podcast hosts

[1.50:44 - 1.50:59]Mention of a Reddit post and sirens being used

[1.53:25 - 1.53:37]Potential topics for further discussion: Taylor, Vosch, and James

[1.53:37 - 1.53:46]The shocking nature of Vosch's clips

[1.53:46 - 1.54:07]Taylor Swift vs. Celine Vosch debate

[1.54:54 - 1.55:00]Vosch's involvement and potential for communication

[1.55:06 - 1.55:24]Consideration of changing the podcast title to include Vosch or the Super Bowl

[1.55:37 - 1.55:47]Excitement about the Vosch situation

[1.55:37 - 1.55:47]Reference to "super bowl" as "the Vosch situation" or "stiff person disease"

[1.44:41 - 1.55:47]Discussion about content frequency, Super Bowl, Taylor Kelsey's dating life, surprise about Taylor Swift, speculation about Super Bowl halftime performance and Usher's age, Gabe's appreciation for hosts, sirens being used, Vosch's involvement, and potential topics for further discussion. Excitement about the Vosch situation and consideration of changing podcast title. Mention of shocking clips and potential for communication.

[2.01:40 - 2.02:12]Vash, a popular political commentator, accidentally exposed his "corn folder" on stream

[2.03:24 - 2.03:33]Vash's fans are defending him, but others find the situation funny

[2.04:23 - 2.04:54]The stream ended abruptly after this incident

[2.04:23 - 2.04:54]The incident has similarities to past incidents with conservative figures

[2.05:28 - 2.05:44]The incident has sparked discussions and jokes online

[2.06:01 - 2.06:09]There is a higher-resolution version of the incident available

[2.06:09 - 2.06:23]The overall situation is being referred to as "horse corn gate"

[1.55:47 - 2.06:23]"Horse corn gate" involves Vash accidentally exposing his "corn folder" on stream, sparking discussions and jokes online.

[2.06:31 - 2.06:47] The audio discusses Vash being afraid of horses and his fascination with them.

[2.10:59 - 2.11:07]They also discuss Vash's organized porn folders, including one labeled "16" with sexual images of a 16-year-old anime character.

[2.15:16 - 2.15:49]The audio then moves on to discussing questionable clips from Vash's past, including him saying that possession of child pornography should be legal.

[2.15:16 - 2.15:49]Vash's controversial comments and behavior have led to criticism from others.

[2.16:07 - 2.17:00]Vash also talks about how people are inconsistent in their moral outrage towards certain commodities.

[2.06:23 - 2.17:00]Overall, the audio highlights Vash's fascination with horses and his controversial views on child pornography.

[2.18:00 - 2.18:26]Audio is a transcription of a conversation

[2.20:37 - 2.20:59]Discussion starts with child rapists and chocolate

[2.22:07 - 2.22:16]Speaker discusses the idea of context and full understanding

[2.22:16 - 2.22:25]Speaker expresses disdain for child rapists

[2.22:25 - 2.22:36]Speaker discusses possession of child pornography and its immorality

[2.22:25 - 2.22:36]Possession of child pornography creates demand for unethical product

[2.22:25 - 2.22:36]Possession of child pornography can never be ethical

[2.22:44 - 2.23:24]Speaker argues for lower age of consent with advent of socialism

[2.24:58 - 2.25:14]Speaker acknowledges longer clip available but insists on watching compilation first

[2.25:36 - 2.26:00]Conversation shifts to a bet about getting "pwned"

[2.25:36 - 2.26:00]Speaker claims to have a girlfriend and be two hours away from being with someone else

[2.26:00 - 2.26:22]Speaker claims to be skilled at non-monogamy and public speaking

[2.26:00 - 2.26:22]Reference to "tachoma wept"

[2.26:00 - 2.26:22]Speaker asserts that they have two skills: non-monogamy and public speaking

[2.26:00 - 2.26:22]Speaker references needing to say "tachoma wept" whenever something big happens

[2.17:00 - 2.26:29]Discussion about child rapists and possession of child pornography, argument for lower age of consent with socialism, mention of "tachoma wept" and claims of non-monogamy and public speaking skills.

[2.27:44 - 2.27:50]The speaker talks about a person named "tachoma wept" who is good at public speaking and sex.

[2.33:29 - 2.34:39]The speaker mentions that this person has made a comment about child pornography not being morally or legally wrong.

[2.34:39 - 2.35:09]They play a clip of the person talking about this argument and explain the context behind it.

[2.34:39 - 2.35:09]The speaker argues that people are inconsistent in their moral outrage, using examples of unethical products such as chocolate and cobalt.

[2.34:39 - 2.35:09]The speaker addresses the accusation of defending child pornography and denies ever making such arguments.

[2.35:45 - 2.35:55]They make a joke about the person "tachoma wept" being the same person as "Mr. Hands."

[2.35:55 - 2.36:04]They mention having this person in the "back pocket" for years and referencing them in the past.

[2.35:55 - 2.36:04]The speaker talks about how they purposely avoided talking about this person in the past.

[2.35:55 - 2.36:04]They argue that child pornography is not a commodity and cannot be ethically produced.

[2.35:55 - 2.36:04]They move on to discuss a famous case of a man dying while attempting to have sex with a horse, which was known as "Mr. Hands."

[2.36:04 - 2.36:19]The speaker then mentions a comment from the chat about turning on the AC, possibly as a reference to the person "Brad."

[2.26:29 - 2.36:30]The final bullet point is a summary of all the previous points, mentioning the discussion about "tachoma wept," their comment on child pornography, and the mention of "Mr. Hands" and "Brad."

[2.37:59 - 2.38:37] The audio is a conversation discussing a controversial public figure and his views on pedophilia and bestiality.

[2.38:37 - 2.38:59]The figure is described as a good communicator and a smart person.

[2.42:18 - 2.42:27]He believes that the acquisition of commodities involves immoral practices and compares it to the illegality of child pornography.

[2.42:58 - 2.43:20]He is known for his controversial opinions and has been cancelled multiple times.

[2.43:25 - 2.43:34]He claims that people who accuse him of being a pedophile are too scared to say it to his face.

[2.43:41 - 2.43:51]There is a suggestion of a potential debate between the figure and the speaker.

[2.44:30 - 2.44:55]The conversation questions the logic and validity of his arguments.

[2.45:18 - 2.45:51]The speaker expresses discomfort with the topic and does not want to engage in a debate.

[2.36:30 - 2.46:55]The conversation discusses a controversial public figure and his justifications for the legality of child pornography and bestiality, questioning the logic and validity of his arguments and suggesting a potential debate.

[2.48:18 - 2.48:49]Vash discusses the topic of sexual relationships between adults and children, and whether it is possible for them to have positive outcomes for the child.

[2.54:11 - 2.54:25]The co-host questions the need for this conversation and suggests that it may be harmful to have it.

[2.55:05 - 2.55:16]Vash's co-host expresses confusion and discomfort with the conversation and questions the purpose of having it.

[2.55:16 - 2.55:36]He argues that utilitarianism, specifically act utilitarianism, should be considered when evaluating the consequences of this type of relationship.

[2.55:43 - 2.56:09]Vash responds by saying that it is possible for an adult and child to have a sexual relationship with positive outcomes for the child, but it is generally discouraged due to the potential harm to society.

[2.55:43 - 2.56:09]Vash's co-host also brings up the fact that Vash has made similar arguments in the past, which could be seen as rationalizing the consumption of child pornography.

[2.55:43 - 2.56:09]Vash responds by saying that CP is just as bad as child slavery and that if one is okay, the other must be as well.

[2.55:43 - 2.56:09]Vash then explains the difference between act and rule utilitarianism and how the latter would view sexual relationships between adults and children as generally bad.

[2.56:11 - 2.56:18]Vash ends the conversation by saying that he has no time to continue discussing the topic and will address it later.

[2.56:34 - 2.56:42]The co-host brings up the stereotype of philosophers sleeping with their students and suggests that Vash may be trying to rationalize his own potential attraction to children.

[2.56:34 - 2.56:42]Vash discusses the possibility of positive outcomes in sexual relationships between adults and children.

[2.56:34 - 2.56:42]He argues that utilitarianism should be considered in evaluating these relationships.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]The co-host disagrees and points out that there are ways to ethically consume certain products, but there is no ethical way to consume CP.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash's fan in the chat defends him and suggests that those who view CP as bad simply haven't thought about it enough.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash's co-host questions the purpose and potential harm of this conversation.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash defends his argument and brings up the comparison of CP to child slavery.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]The co-host disagrees and points out the lack of ethical ways to consume CP.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash explains the difference between act and rule utilitarianism and how it applies to this topic.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]The co-host suggests that Vash's argument may be influenced by the stereotype of philosophers sleeping with their students.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash's fan in the chat defends him and suggests that those who view CP as bad simply haven't thought about it enough.

[2.56:56 - 2.57:14]Vash ends the conversation, saying he has no time to continue discussing the topic.

[2.46:57 - 2.57:14]In summary, Vash and his co-host discuss the possibility of positive outcomes in sexual relationships between adults and children, with Vash arguing that utilitarianism should be considered. His co-host questions the purpose and potential harm of this conversation, and Vash defends his argument by comparing it to child slavery. The co-host disagrees and points out the lack of ethical ways to consume CP. Vash explains the difference between act and rule utilitarianism and how it applies to this topic, while the co-host suggests that Vash's argument may be influenced by the stereotype of philosophers sleeping with their students. Vash's fan in the chat defends him and suggests that those who view CP as bad simply haven't thought about it enough. Vash ends the conversation, saying he has no time to continue discussing the topic.

[3.01:53 - 3.02:05]Vos expresses his thoughts on a controversial topic and explains his reasoning.

[3.03:13 - 3.03:41]Vos refutes a point made by someone else, explaining that supporting one action is not always the right choice.

[3.03:13 - 3.03:41]He discusses the topic of child pornography with another person, who seems to have emotional reactions to the discussion.

[3.03:13 - 3.03:41]Vos makes a reference to a video game and discusses a philosophical point related to child pornography.

[3.03:13 - 3.03:41]The other person questions why Vos always uses child pornography as an example in his arguments.

[3.03:41 - 3.03:56]He argues that allowing destructive practices, even for the off-chance of helping someone, is unethical.

[3.03:41 - 3.03:56]He defends his stance on the topic, saying that he is a rule utilitarian.

[3.03:56 - 3.04:13]Vos argues that it is possible for an adult and a child to have a positive outcome in a sexual relationship, but the other person disagrees.

[3.04:28 - 3.04:45]Vos continues to defend his stance, saying that he is not an idealist and only wants to discuss material reality.

[3.05:03 - 3.05:16]The discussion ends with Vos still believing that his argument is valid and the other person disagreeing.

[3.05:34 - 3.05:54]He makes a joke about having sex with a child and the other person criticizes him for it.

[3.06:47 - 3.06:55]They continue to debate, with Vos making a hypothetical scenario involving aliens to support his point.

[3.06:55 - 3.07:06]The other person becomes frustrated and Vos accuses them of being overly emotional.

[3.06:55 - 3.07:06]Vos believes that his arguments are not idealism, despite the other person's claims.

[3.07:08 - 3.07:30]Vos has a lot of fans who will defend his stance on controversial topics.

[2.57:14 - 3.07:30]Vos discusses the topic of child pornography and defends his stance that it is possible for an adult and a child to have a positive outcome in a sexual relationship. He uses hypothetical scenarios and jokes to support his argument, while the other person disagrees and accuses him of being overly emotional. The discussion ends with both parties maintaining their opposing views.

[3.07:30 - 3.07:58] The discussion revolves around defending extreme hypotheticals and how it impacts one's views.

[3.12:12 - 3.12:17]There is a disagreement on the definition of idealism and its relation to constructing hypothetical situations.

[3.12:12 - 3.12:17]The debate shifts to the ethical implications of a hypothetical encounter with an extraterrestrial.

[3.13:03 - 3.13:10]The group discusses the lack of solidarity within the left community.

[3.14:41 - 3.14:47]There is a mention of a community of pedophiles and the discussion of tolerance levels.

[3.14:41 - 3.14:47]The overall tone of the discussion is perceived as defending pedophilia.

[3.14:47 - 3.14:53]The conversation takes a comedic turn with jokes about ET and horse-related content.

[3.14:47 - 3.14:53]The controversial nature of the discussion and its implications are acknowledged.

[3.15:35 - 3.15:40]The group discusses the ethical implications of drawn images and whether it is considered "kink."

[3.15:40 - 3.15:47]The context of the discussion is changed by the existence of a folder full of disturbing images.

[3.15:40 - 3.15:47]The high-resolution versions of the disturbing images are found and discussed.

[3.15:40 - 3.15:47]The existence of a folder full of disturbing images is seen as proof of pedophile sympathies.

[3.16:38 - 3.16:43]The use of a popular song in the discussion is edited.

[3.16:49 - 3.16:56]The discussion ends with a final statement about not wanting to shame kinks, but drawing the line when it comes to disturbing and potentially harmful content.

[3.16:56 - 3.17:17]The conversation takes a humorous turn with jokes about horses being beasts of burden and not wanting to engage in sexual acts with humans.

[3.07:30 - 3.17:32]The overall theme of the discussion is the defense and justification of extreme hypotheticals and the impact on one's views.

[3.20:06 - 3.20:28] Vash is addressing accusations regarding horse porn found in his folder

[3.20:28 - 3.20:38]Uses clips from 4-5 years ago as defense

[3.21:32 - 3.21:44]Conversation about hentai and child predators in Japan

[3.21:32 - 3.21:44]Questioning if consuming loli hentai lowers frequency of harming actual children

[3.21:59 - 3.22:04]Glad he can separate brand from opinions

[3.22:21 - 3.22:49]Mention of ethical conversation in Japan about this topic

[3.23:04 - 3.23:40]Compilation of Vash talking about horsecock on Discord

[3.23:04 - 3.23:40]Vash's past jokes about horses being into horses

[3.23:04 - 3.23:40]Post from 3 years ago with compilation of Vash talking about horsecock

[3.25:07 - 3.25:20]Discussion about anime and sexual content in Japan

[3.25:07 - 3.25:20]Mention of popular loli and shota content in Japan

[3.25:07 - 3.25:20]Mention of underage models and photography in Japan

[3.25:07 - 3.25:20]Discussion about anime and sexual content in general

[3.26:14 - 3.26:23]Comparison to Sinjared and disturbing behavior

[3.26:44 - 3.26:52]Mention of specific anime shows without sexual content

[3.26:44 - 3.26:52]Conversation about Fullmetal Alchemist and other wholesome shows

[3.26:52 - 3.26:57]Questioning if consuming this content leads to more disturbing behavior

[3.26:57 - 3.27:03]Mention of Miyazaki movies being appropriate

[3.27:03 - 3.27:10]Mention of Vash having explicit sexual conversations with fans

[3.27:10 - 3.27:45]Ethan asks Vash what age he would let his kids watch anime

[3.27:10 - 3.27:45]Discussion about sexual content in anime and finding shows without it

[3.27:10 - 3.27:45]Uncertainty about what age is appropriate for kids to watch anime

[3.17:32 - 3.27:45]Vash addresses accusations about horse porn, discusses ethical conversation in Japan about hentai and child predators, and talks about inappropriate sexual content in anime.

[3.28:00 - 3.28:07]Audio is being played from 2018 about horse talk and keyword searches

[3.28:56 - 3.29:08]Vash expresses interest in being a horse

[3.28:56 - 3.29:08]The podcast discusses Vash's obsession with horses and his leaked horse folder

[3.29:37 - 3.30:22]Vash calls in to debate and is accused of being a "disgusting, lonely, and loveless man"

[3.31:23 - 3.31:32]Ethan offers to let Vash call in for a future discussion

[3.36:35 - 3.36:44]Vash defends himself and claims Ethan did not reach out to him before making a "generic smear piece"

[3.37:42 - 3.37:50]Ethan and the podcast have a generally positive opinion of Vash's content

[3.27:45 - 3.37:50]Audio is from 2018 and is about horse talk and keyword searches

[3.37:50 - 3.38:03]Michael Jackson's alleged misconduct and Vosch's defense of him are discussed

[3.38:03 - 3.38:30]Ethan and Vosch's friendship and past relationship is brought up

[3.38:38 - 3.38:49]Dan's apparent denial of knowing Vosch is questioned

[3.39:31 - 3.39:38]A request is made for a "supercut" of their friendship

[3.41:23 - 3.41:49]A message is shared calling for an end to discussing controversial topics like horse porn and child pornography

[3.42:51 - 3.43:19]Vosch is asked to address his past controversial statements and seek therapy

[3.46:07 - 3.46:20]Vosch's fans and supporters are criticized for defending him and dismissing his past statements

[3.46:07 - 3.46:20]The idea of Vosch debating Ethan on the topic is discussed

[3.46:30 - 3.46:40]The earthquake during the podcast is briefly mentioned

[3.47:38 - 3.48:10]A consensus is reached to title the episode "Horsing Around with a Leftist Streamer"

[3.48:10 - 3.48:19]Potential titles for the podcast episode are suggested, including involving Vosch and Hassan

[3.37:50 - 3.48:19]A summary of the discussion is given, highlighting the call for Vosch to address his past statements and seek therapy.

[3.48:19 - 3.48:56] Discussion about creating clickbait content and using Hassan as a part of it.

[3.48:56 - 3.49:05]Bathroom break.

[3.49:47 - 3.49:53]Choosing a title for the clickbait content.

[3.52:52 - 3.53:09]Appreciation for fans and supporters.

[3.53:46 - 3.54:05]A member giving 50 gifts.

[3.54:10 - 3.54:17]An inside joke about firing an employee.

[3.55:01 - 3.55:18]A discussion about rent prices in different areas.

[3.58:05 - 3.58:10]A new member discussing their apartment.

[3.58:18 - 3.58:28]Short discussion about the dislike for LA.

[3.58:58 - 3.59:08]Thanking viewers and ending the stream.

[3.48:19 - 3.59:08]The streamers discuss creating clickbait content, choosing a title for it, and having a bathroom break. They also appreciate their fans and discuss renting prices and personal living situations. The stream ends with a thank you to viewers.