[00:00 - 00:54]He claims the Bible is imprinted in his brain.

[00:11 - 00:36]A discussion about the Bible and its author takes place.

[00:55 - 01:41]The hosts discuss Reddit and its content.

[02:08 - 02:23]The hosts argue about the content of the podcast and the need to move on to the next question.

[02:23 - 04:48]The first question is whether they would rather sit on a cake and eat a dick or eat a dick and sit on a cake.

[04:25 - 04:54]The discussion becomes more explicit and comedic.

[05:14 - 06:16]The first question is whether they would rather sit on a cake and eat a dick or eat a dick and sit on a cake.

[05:27 - 05:48]They debate the pros and cons of each option, with one host choosing the cake and the other choosing the dick.

[06:16 - 07:50]The first question is whether they would rather sit on a cake and eat a dick or eat a dick and sit on a cake.

[06:59 - 08:11]The hosts argue about the content of the podcast and the need to move on to the next question.

[07:06 - 07:17]The speaker is willing to "lock in" and is in the same place as everyone else.

[07:37 - 07:57]They move on to a question about choosing between going to hell or heaven for 30 minutes, with no torture.

[07:57 - 08:05]The speaker is willing to "lock in" and is in the same place as everyone else.

[07:57 - 08:35]They introduce a segment where they ask difficult "would you rather" questions.

[08:05 - 08:40]They move on to a question about choosing between going to hell or heaven for 30 minutes, with no torture.

[08:11 - 08:23]The next question is about never being stuck in traffic again or never getting another cold.

[08:35 - 09:23]The first question is whether they would rather sit on a cake and eat a dick or eat a dick and sit on a cake.

[08:41 - 08:59]They move on to a question about choosing between going to hell or heaven for 30 minutes, with no torture.

[08:59 - 10:05]They would choose to go to hell to determine for themselves if it is as bad as portrayed.

[10:05 - 10:18]The speaker is motivated by fear and believes that people are generally motivated by negativity.

[10:19 - 12:14]The speaker believes knowing the reality of hell and heaven would help them make a decision.

[10:40 - 11:42]They discuss the possibility that hell may not be as bad as expected.

[11:42 - 14:10]The speaker believes people gravitate towards negativity to identify and avoid it.

[12:38 - 13:17]The speaker is willing to "lock in" and is in the same place as everyone else.

[12:50 - 13:41]They talk about the impact of negative comments compared to positive ones.

[13:42 - 14:46]They discuss the possibility that hell may not be as bad as expected.

[13:48 - 14:04]The speaker believes people gravitate towards negativity to identify and avoid it.

[14:10 - 15:06]The speaker is willing to "lock in" and is in the same place as everyone else.

[14:47 - 15:13]They discuss the possibility that hell may not be as bad as expected.

[15:13 - 16:09]The next question is about never being stuck in traffic again or never getting another cold.

[16:09 - 16:34]One speaker has bad allergies and would choose to be cured of them.

[16:34 - 16:48]The conversation is taking place during the COVID-19 pandemic.

[16:48 - 17:26]The speakers discuss the lack of traffic on the roads

[16:48 - 18:03]The next question is about never being stuck in traffic again or never getting another cold.

[17:26 - 17:34]One speaker suggests that there may be a perpetual COVID virus causing the lack of traffic

[17:34 - 17:40]They debate whether this is due to clear sinuses or lack of traffic

[17:41 - 17:58]They discuss whether they would prefer no traffic and a cold every few weeks or always being in traffic but never getting a cold

[17:58 - 18:03]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[18:03 - 18:33]They discuss the frustration of traffic and how it affects their mood

[18:09 - 18:17]They debate whether this is due to clear sinuses or lack of traffic

[18:34 - 18:39]They continue to debate the trade-off between no traffic and getting a cold, with one speaker suggesting that they could put droplets of poison around the other's house

[18:40 - 19:03]One speaker suggests that they could listen to podcasts while in traffic, causing the other to criticize a specific podcast

[19:04 - 19:52]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[19:14 - 19:34]They discuss the severity of getting a cold and how it affects their daily life

[19:34 - 19:58]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[19:58 - 20:44]They discuss the frustration of traffic and how it affects their mood

[20:03 - 20:10]They continue to debate the trade-off between no traffic and getting a cold, with one speaker suggesting that they could put droplets of poison around the other's house

[20:10 - 20:16]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[20:17 - 20:22]One speaker suggests that they could take medication for a cold, while the other would rather be in traffic

[20:24 - 20:34]One speaker suggests that they could listen to podcasts while in traffic, causing the other to criticize a specific podcast

[20:44 - 20:53]They discuss the frustration of traffic and how it affects their mood

[20:53 - 21:12]One speaker suggests that they could remove all speed limits, causing the other to call them morally compromised

[21:20 - 21:42]One speaker suggests that they could take medication for a cold, while the other would rather be in traffic

[21:43 - 21:48]They continue to debate the trade-off between no traffic and getting a cold, with one speaker suggesting that they could put droplets of poison around the other's house

[21:48 - 22:00]They continue to debate the trade-off between no traffic and getting a cold

[22:02 - 23:01]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[22:08 - 22:14]One speaker suggests that they could listen to podcasts while in traffic, causing the other to criticize a specific podcast

[22:14 - 22:55]They discuss the severity of getting a cold and how it affects their daily life

[23:02 - 23:46]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[23:46 - 23:53]One speaker suggests that they could listen to podcasts while in traffic, causing the other to criticize a specific podcast

[23:53 - 24:17]They discuss the frustration of traffic and how it affects their mood

[24:17 - 24:29]One speaker suggests that they could take medication for a cold, while the other would rather be in traffic

[24:29 - 24:50]They discuss whether they would prefer no traffic and a cold every few weeks or always being in traffic but never getting a cold

[24:52 - 24:58]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[25:00 - 25:15]They discuss the severity of getting a cold and how it affects their daily life

[25:16 - 25:28]They end by summarizing the initial question and discussing the potential effects of the other's actions.

[25:29 - 25:40]They continue to debate the trade-off between no traffic and getting a cold, with one speaker suggesting that they could put droplets of poison around the other's house

[25:40 - 25:45]They discuss the severity of getting a cold and how it affects their daily life

[25:45 - 26:02]They debate whether this is due to clear sinuses or lack of traffic

[26:03 - 26:11]They discuss the severity of getting a cold and how it affects their daily life

[26:11 - 26:20]They end by summarizing the initial question and discussing the potential effects of the other's actions.

[26:21 - 26:38]One speaker argues that they would rather have no traffic, while the other suggests that they would regret this decision when they get sick

[26:21 - 27:42]The question is whether they would rather be very small, very fat, very ugly, or very stupid.

[26:38 - 26:45]One speaker suggests that they could listen to podcasts while in traffic, causing the other to criticize a specific podcast

[27:43 - 29:37]Ted initially chooses to be very stupid as well, but then changes his answer to wanting to be very small.

[28:45 - 29:48]Charlie chooses to be very stupid because he believes he can have a carefree life with "himbo energy."

[29:52 - 30:48]The question is whether they would rather be very small, very fat, very ugly, or very stupid.

[29:57 - 30:19]Ted initially chooses to be very stupid as well, but then changes his answer to wanting to be very small.

[30:19 - 32:26]Charlie asks what they would look like if they were very ugly, and suggests fan artists draw them in their respective choices.

[32:26 - 33:46]The discussion then ends with a lighter question about whether they prefer silly talking lizards or angry men.

[32:34 - 33:15]Ted mentions being told he would make a good Vineyard Vines model, and Charlie agrees.

[33:46 - 35:38]The conversation then shifts to a controversial "would you rather" question: taking away all women's rights or never being able to do anything enjoyable.

[35:38 - 36:13]Two individuals, Ted and Charlie, are discussing a "would you rather" question.

[36:13 - 37:06]Ted struggles with the question, but ultimately chooses to take away women's rights.

[37:06 - 38:01]The discussion then ends with a lighter question about whether they prefer silly talking lizards or angry men.

[37:19 - 37:29]The first speaker suggests a new power

[37:29 - 38:20]Two people discussing conspiracy theories about presidents being silly talking lizards

[38:20 - 39:00]Mention of Harry Truman and his lack of a middle name

[39:00 - 39:19]The other speaker questions the first speaker's sanity

[39:19 - 40:22]Discussion about morning routines and waking up early

[40:22 - 40:36]The other speaker questions the first speaker's sanity

[40:44 - 42:25]Discussion about morning routines and waking up early

[41:35 - 41:47]The other speaker questions the first speaker's sanity

[42:25 - 43:25]Discussion about morning routines and waking up early

[42:42 - 43:18]The text ends with an off-topic comment about the size of the speaker's penis.

[43:25 - 45:28]Discussion about morning routines and waking up early

[44:34 - 44:57]Briefly mention of the immortal snail question

[44:57 - 46:16]Discussion about morning routines and waking up early

[45:28 - 46:45]Mention of a friend who runs every day

[46:45 - 48:15]The other speaker chooses the power to summon an army of frogs

[46:51 - 47:35]Discussion about biblical plague powers and which one the speakers would choose

[48:16 - 49:16]Briefly mention of the immortal snail question

[48:56 - 50:16]Discussion about the possibility of trapping the snail

[49:53 - 52:14]The speaker explains how he would handle the snail problem

[50:57 - 51:41]Discussion about the possibility of trapping the snail

[51:42 - 51:50]The speaker jokingly suggests hiring a witch

[51:50 - 51:56]Two people discussing conspiracy theories about presidents being silly talking lizards

[52:14 - 52:31]The discussion then turns to the topic of the snail again

[52:14 - 54:33]The speaker and the other person joke about "dick and mouth" and "dick and ass"

[54:33 - 55:27]The speaker and the other person took a funny picture together

[55:27 - 56:05]The speaker then tells another story about accidentally damaging their own car while backing up

[56:06 - 57:40]The movie was very long and the speaker didn't like it

[57:41 - 59:14]The speaker was watching the movie in a drive-through and had a conversation with someone in the car in front of them

[58:38 - 1.01:05]The speaker then tells another story about accidentally damaging their own car while backing up

[59:28 - 1.02:18]The speaker and the other person took a funny picture together

[1.01:48 - 1.05:19]The speaker then tells another story about accidentally damaging their own car while backing up

[1.05:04 - 1.05:37]The video ends with the speaker saying "thanks for watching" and "bye"