HasanAbi March 4, 2024 – Dune 2, SCOTUS Trump Decision, UN Report on Israel, El Salvador Prisons
[09:58 - 11:18]speaker talks about emo culture and its definition
[11:18 - 12:01]mentions stubbing toe on chair and feeling alone
[12:01 - 12:36]references lyrics from song "I Write Sins Not Tragedies" by Panic! At The Disco
[13:58 - 14:13]talks about being live in sunny Los Angeles and personal news
[18:14 - 18:24]mentions watching a movie with friends and enjoying it
[20:59 - 21:25]reveals that the movie was "Dune" and praises its director Denis Villeneuve
[22:15 - 22:46]compares pacing of first movie to second movie and praises the action and intensity of the second movie
[22:15 - 22:46]clarifies that the first movie is also good but the second one is even better
[22:15 - 22:46]mentions that the movie is a critique of the white savior narrative
[00:16 - 22:46]Speaker discusses emo culture, mentions personal news, and praises the movie "Dune" directed by Denis Villeneuve for its action, intensity, and critique of the white savior narrative.
[25:24 - 25:33]Yes, the speaker doesn't care about assessments and criticism of Dune.
[33:17 - 33:23]The speaker believes there is a larger message in Dune that most people are not comprehending.
[33:17 - 33:23]They believe that people are critiquing Dune based on the standards of other movies and works of art.
[33:17 - 33:23]The author, Frank Herbert, described the pacing of Dune as building up until a sudden climax.
[33:17 - 33:23]The speaker affirms that there is nothing more powerful than Dune and that it utilizes Arab culture.
[33:35 - 34:41]Viewing Dune through a white supremacist framework will cause one to miss the larger message.
[33:35 - 34:41]They dismiss claims that Frank Herbert was a libertarian and homophobe, stating that it doesn't matter.
[36:20 - 36:26]The speaker expresses their enjoyment of the acting and specifically praises Javier Bardem and Austin Butler.
[36:20 - 36:26]The speaker has read part of the first book and mentions comparisons to real-life conflicts.
[36:26 - 36:36]The speaker believes that everything the viewer thinks is going on in Dune will change after the movie.
[36:26 - 36:36]The speaker believes that it is impossible to watch Dune and not see its leftist themes.
[36:26 - 36:36]They mention the concept of Orientalism and how it relates to Dune.
[36:26 - 36:36]They dismiss claims that Dune is mocking Muslim culture.
[36:26 - 36:36]The speaker mentions the inspiration for Dune and suggests a film about anti-colonial efforts against the French.
[36:55 - 37:03]They bring up David Lynch's adaptation of Dune and how he hates it.
[36:55 - 37:03]The speaker constantly turned to someone named Will during the movie to make comments.
[22:46 - 37:03]Overall, the speaker believes that Dune has a larger message that people are not comprehending and that it is a leftist work with anti-colonial themes.
[50:56 - 51:05] The speaker watched Dune Part 2 and thought it was amazing.
[51:17 - 51:22]They were losing their mind during the movie and had a physical reaction to certain parts.
[51:17 - 51:22]They discussed the absence of certain elements from the original work in the movie.
[51:17 - 51:22]They talked about the potential for the movie to cover the entire book series.
[51:17 - 51:22]The speaker's friend mentioned Timothy Charlemagne as a sandworm and called him "twink death."
[51:17 - 51:22]They discussed the taste of the blue drink in the movie.
[51:17 - 51:22]The movie was not "woke" and the original author, Frank Herbert, was a libertarian.
[51:22 - 51:27]They enjoyed the world building in the movie and compared it to the original work.
[51:22 - 51:27]The speaker mentioned a potential open world MMO game based on Dune.
[51:22 - 51:27]They talked about the movie director being anti-capitalist and "pro-Kubek separation."
[51:22 - 51:27]They briefly mentioned a book called "N-word of America" and the speaker's newfound support for Kubek separatism.
[51:22 - 51:27]The conversation shifted to French news and the speaker's criticism of French President Macron.
[51:22 - 51:27]They discussed abortion and Islam in France.
[51:22 - 51:27]The speaker mentioned enjoying Dune Part 2 despite knowing all the spoilers from reading the novel as a child.
[51:22 - 51:27]They mentioned a Turkish person's opinion on the movie and the director's ability to bring a "Kubek touch" to it.
[51:22 - 51:27]They mentioned a Turkish person's opinion on the movie and the director's ability to bring a "Kubek touch" to it.
[51:22 - 51:27]They mentioned a Turkish person's opinion on the movie and the director's ability to bring a "Kubek touch" to it.
[37:03 - 51:27]The speaker watched Dune Part 2 and enjoyed the world building and physical reactions during the movie. They discussed the movie's adaptation of the original work and the potential for it to cover the entire book series. They also briefly mentioned a potential open world MMO game based on Dune. The conversation then shifted to French news and the speaker's criticism of French President Macron. They also mentioned enjoying the movie despite knowing all the spoilers from reading the novel as a child, and the director's potential "Kubek touch" on the movie. The speaker also joked about the director bringing their hometown into their work.
[51:27 - 51:44]The speaker discusses the idea of alienation of religion and the control of the church over French Canadians.
[54:52 - 55:06]They mention the mistreatment of French Canadians and their lack of economical power.
[54:52 - 55:06]The speaker jokes about how a Kubecker would understand the plight of colonized peoples.
[57:36 - 58:16]The speaker discusses Dune and its use of Arab culture without any Arab actors.
[59:20 - 59:25]The speaker discusses the lack of diversity in the movie and compares it to the previous adaptation.
[59:25 - 59:33]They joke about the French being indigenous to Canada and make a reference to the movie Dune.
[59:33 - 59:56]They mention a boycott of the movie and a quote from President Trump about the evil doings of Israel and the United States.
[1.01:58 - 1.02:07]The speaker discusses the mistreatment of Kubeckers and compares it to chattel slavery and ethnic cleansing.
[1.02:07 - 1.02:17]They mention Javier Bardham's stance on Israel and a potential SNL skit.
[1.02:17 - 1.02:38]The speaker talks about Timothy Charlemagne and his facial structure.
[1.02:38 - 1.02:44]They mention AP News running a story about homos committing sexual violence.
[1.04:59 - 1.05:05]They mention a cute girl they recently started dating who is also boycotting the movie.
[51:27 - 1.05:23]The speaker discusses the mistreatment of French Canadians and their lack of power under the control of the church. They joke about a Kubecker understanding the plight of colonized peoples and mention a news story about sexual violence. They compare the mistreatment of Kubeckers to chattel slavery and ethnic cleansing. They discuss the lack of diversity in the movie Dune and mention a boycott. The speaker concludes by saying that the focus should be on the anti-colonial themes in the story rather than the casting of Timothy Charlemagne.
[1.05:23 - 1.06:24]Discusses frustration with leftists' lack of effective propaganda techniques
[1.06:37 - 1.06:50]Believes leftists should utilize popular media and cultural garbage for propaganda purposes
[1.06:50 - 1.07:20]Criticizes conservatives for their ability to successfully use media for their agendas
[1.07:26 - 1.07:44]Expresses anger towards leftists' self-imposed poverty cult and inability to enjoy things
[1.07:26 - 1.07:44]Compares enjoyment of art to bourgeois decadence and counter-revolutionary behavior
[1.08:53 - 1.09:37]Urges leftists to be normal and have fun
[1.11:24 - 1.11:54]Admits to not finishing a book on Palestine but advocates for Palestinian liberation
[1.11:24 - 1.11:54]Criticizes those who put others down for their level of activism
[1.12:18 - 1.12:59]Comments on whitewashing and cultural appropriation in Dune
[1.15:17 - 1.15:39]Recommends seeing Dune 2, praises its high intensity and beautiful visuals
[1.15:17 - 1.15:39]Recognizes Dune as a phenomenal intellectual property for propaganda purposes
[1.16:49 - 1.17:06]Compares Dune 2 to a roller coaster, with the first movie being the build-up and the second being the drop
[1.17:17 - 1.17:41]Mentions being valutained while watching the movie
[1.17:41 - 1.18:06]Compares the pacing of Dune 2 to Blade Runner 2049
[1.05:23 - 1.18:13]The speaker expresses frustration with leftists' lack of effective propaganda techniques and advocates for utilizing popular media for propaganda purposes. They also criticize conservatives for their success in using media for their agendas and criticize leftists for their self-imposed poverty cult and inability to enjoy things. The speaker recommends seeing Dune 2 and praises its high intensity and beautiful visuals. They also mention the similarities in pacing between Dune 2 and Blade Runner 2049. Finally, the speaker recognizes Dune as a great intellectual property for propaganda purposes.
[1.18:15 - 1.18:31]Dune movie discussion, comparing it to Evangelical Christianity
[1.18:56 - 1.19:22]Spoilers and world building in the movie
[1.21:59 - 1.22:43]Real world news: Israel-Palestine conflict and ceasefire negotiations
[1.24:16 - 1.25:03]Recent bombing and fighting in Gaza, resulting in death and starvation
[1.25:03 - 1.26:17]Conflict also affects West Bank with incursion and retaliation
[1.28:45 - 1.30:48]Kamala Harris's stance on ceasefire negotiations and aid delivery
[1.28:45 - 1.30:48]Main point of contention is terms of ceasefire, including prisoner swap
[1.28:45 - 1.30:48]Lasting peace in increments with hostage release process
[1.18:15 - 1.30:48]The text discusses the Dune movie and its comparisons to Evangelical Christianity, before delving into the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict and ceasefire negotiations. Kamala Harris's stance on the situation is also mentioned, along with recent bombing and fighting in Gaza and the effects on the people. The conflict has also spread to the West Bank, with incursions and retaliation. The main point of contention is the terms of the ceasefire, specifically the prisoner swap. A lasting peace is desired through incremental releases of hostages.
[1.35:14 - 1.37:06] Kamala Harris speaks about the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, stating that a cease fire will come on Monday with conditions for the next six weeks.
[1.38:13 - 1.38:46]She emphasizes the immense scale of suffering in Gaza and calls for more life-saving aid to be delivered to innocent Palestinians in need.
[1.41:02 - 1.42:40]The US will continue airdrops of humanitarian assistance and work on a new route by sea to deliver aid.
[1.42:40 - 1.43:00]The Israeli government must do more to significantly increase the flow of aid.
[1.43:00 - 1.44:28]The American government's stance on the conflict may put them at odds with the interests of the Netanyahu cabinet.
[1.43:00 - 1.44:28]The Democratic party will likely push themselves in a position that is at odds with the Israeli government, creating a pressure valve.
[1.43:00 - 1.44:28]The villain in this situation may be Benjamin Netanyahu.
[1.43:00 - 1.44:28]The Democratic party will likely assume the liberal Zionist line and start pushing for separation from the Israeli government.
[1.30:48 - 1.44:28]Kamala Harris speaks about the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, stating that a cease fire will come on Monday with conditions for the next six weeks. She emphasizes the need for more aid to be delivered to Gaza and the US will continue to provide assistance. The American government may be at odds with the Netanyahu cabinet and may start pushing for separation from the Israeli government.
[1.44:28 - 1.45:37]Ethnic cleansing campaign by Israel, enforced by Benjamin Netanyahu, has gone too far and needs to be stopped.
[1.46:20 - 1.47:42]Benny Gantz, a more popular leader, should replace Netanyahu and continue the apartheid regime with a liberal veneer.
[1.48:19 - 1.49:01]The US has control over Israel and its actions, and should use it to prevent further violence and promote peace.
[1.49:31 - 1.50:01]Israel's conflict with the American government needs to be resolved for regional stability.
[1.50:07 - 1.51:05]The US is currently side-stepping Netanyahu and working with Gantz to discuss a temporary ceasefire.
[1.50:07 - 1.51:05]The US and Biden are committed to Israel's security, but also support the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people.
[1.51:59 - 1.52:33]The US and other western media often ignore Palestinian perspectives and needs, and push for ineffective solutions like putting the Palestinian Authority in charge of Gaza.
[1.54:47 - 1.56:29]Marwan Barghouti, a Palestinian political figure, is seen as a leader and symbol of resistance against the Israeli occupation, but is currently imprisoned.
[1.57:31 - 1.58:05]The current goal is to secure a ceasefire and aid for Gaza, and work towards a lasting solution that respects the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians.
[1.58:05 - 1.58:12]Barghouti's trial was deemed a sham and his conviction unjust by an independent European institute.
[1.44:28 - 1.58:55]In summary, Israel's actions need to be stopped, a more moderate leader like Gantz should replace Netanyahu, the US should use its power to promote peace and regional stability, and a lasting solution should be sought that respects the rights of both Israelis and Palestinians.
[1.59:03 - 1.59:14]Israel is most violent during Ramadan
[1.59:15 - 1.59:31]Israel increases pressure in West Bank during Ramadan
[1.59:44 - 1.59:54]American State Department considers this a red line
[1.59:58 - 2.00:11]Israel will focus on West Bank during Ramadan
[2.00:11 - 2.00:32]This will create anger among Palestinian population
[2.00:32 - 2.00:46]Ceasefire in Gaza is not enough, Israel must stop ethnic cleansing in West Bank
[2.03:20 - 2.03:27]Israel is not defending Judaism, their actions are antithetical to it
[2.05:13 - 2.05:24]Religion is used as a tool for both abolition and suppression
[2.05:25 - 2.05:36]Religion played a role in the civil war and civil rights movement
[2.06:10 - 2.06:20]Religion can be subject to interpretation and is not the primary motivator
[2.06:31 - 2.06:48]Religion is all Palestinians have and suppressing it is a fascist tool
[2.06:31 - 2.06:48]Palestinians have nothing else but their faith
[2.06:57 - 2.07:04]Israel is not a defender of Judaism, just as ISIS is not a true believer of Islam
[2.09:03 - 2.09:11]Biden administration is redefining ceasefire to avoid changing policies
[2.09:37 - 2.09:59]Religion is a power struggle within Orthodox community
[2.09:59 - 2.10:08]Hassan did not grow up in a cult, but has personal experience with religion
[2.11:02 - 2.11:17]Religion has played a role in both defending and abolishing slavery
[2.11:40 - 2.11:49]Religion is used to justify abortion restrictions, but not all Christians support these restrictions
[1.58:56 - 2.14:28]During the holy month of Ramadan, Israel becomes more violent and increases pressure in the West Bank. American State Department considers this a red line and Israel will focus on West Bank. This causes anger among Palestinian population and a ceasefire in Gaza is not enough, as Israel continues its ethnic cleansing campaign in the West Bank. Religion is all Palestinians have and suppressing it is a fascist tool. Israel is not defending Judaism and their actions are antithetical to it. Religion can be used as a tool for both abolition and suppression, and has played a role in various historical events. The Biden administration is redefining ceasefire to avoid changing policies. Religion is a power struggle within Orthodox community, and Hassan has personal experience with religion. Religion has played a role in both defending and abolishing slavery, and is currently used to justify abortion restrictions in the United States. Americans lack perspective on the suppression of religion in other parts of the world.
[2.18:39 - 2.18:58] Conversation between two individuals about religious suppression and the importance of religion in people's lives
[2.21:16 - 2.21:29]Mention of events in Israel and Gaza, including the throwing of flashbang grenades into a mosque and a recent massacre involving Palestinian teachers
[2.24:01 - 2.24:07]Discussion of the changing nature of chat commentary and the need for more "hogs" (intelligent and relevant commenters)
[2.25:58 - 2.26:04]Criticism of the flawed analogy of asking people to open their homes to Palestinians as a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
[2.29:00 - 2.29:13]Possible fake conversation about the October 7 massacre and the involvement of UNRA teachers
[2.29:00 - 2.29:13]Mention of UN internal investigations into the involvement of UNRA teachers in the October 7 massacre
[2.14:29 - 2.29:13]Conversation about religious suppression and events in Israel and Gaza, including a possible fake conversation about the October 7 massacre and the involvement of UNRA teachers. Criticism of chat commentary and the flawed analogy of opening homes to Palestinians.
[2.29:13 - 2.29:24] Two people out of 13,000 UNRA hires participated in October 7
[2.35:11 - 2.35:29]Witnessed moments of sensitivity and care from captors
[2.38:27 - 2.38:46]Guards receiving calls and losing control, family taken to a supermarket and witnesses damage from Israeli offensive
[2.38:27 - 2.38:46]Guards put matches and bodies over family to protect them from Israeli forces
[2.38:27 - 2.38:46]Eldest daughter shot in the face by Hamas, family abducted and captors smile and take photographs
[2.38:53 - 2.39:00]Former hostage describes time in Hamas captivity, including conversations with guards and discussions about politics and the Israel-Palestine conflict
[2.39:30 - 2.39:37]Conditions of hostages must be seen in the framework of Israel's treatment of Palestinians
[2.39:39 - 2.39:45]Israeli hostages excited for Israel to stop bombing Palestinians
[2.40:00 - 2.40:06]Israeli government is responsible for killing hostages, not Hamas militants
[2.29:13 - 2.40:20]Former hostage describes time in Hamas captivity and how their treatment must be seen in the context of Israel's treatment of Palestinians. Israeli hostages are excited for Israel to stop bombing Palestinians and the Israeli government is responsible for killing hostages.
[2.40:20 - 2.40:26]A conversation discussing the influence of coverage on the Israel-Palestine conflict and how some people have changed their views
[2.40:36 - 2.41:02]The speaker's goal is to inform people and many were previously oblivious to the situation
[2.42:22 - 2.42:37]The speaker will investigate the latest developments in the Israeli occupying force opening fire and try to verify claims
[2.45:42 - 2.46:01]The report also states that systematic rape by Hamas is an erroneous claim with no evidence
[2.47:31 - 2.47:43]The report was conducted by the UN but is not investigative in nature and only reinforces lack of investigation
[2.49:29 - 2.49:34]The media is spinning the report as an investigation and perpetuating false information
[2.49:37 - 2.49:49]The UN has issued a report claiming that hostages held in Gaza were subjected to sexual violence and there is evidence to support this
[2.53:54 - 2.54:01]The speaker was given information about the Agra program to rape a woman, but it is not their role to investigate
[2.54:16 - 2.54:28]The speaker received reports from survivors and service providers about door-to-door activity in villages, specifically in Marryoupol
[2.54:41 - 2.54:47]The speaker was asked if there was proof for the fire, but they do not have any and it is not their role to investigate
[2.40:20 - 2.54:53]A conversation discussing the influence of coverage on the Israel-Palestine conflict, with a focus on the UN's report on sexual violence in Gaza and the media's misrepresentation of the report as an investigation. The speaker also mentions receiving reports about the Agra program to rape women and door-to-door activity in certain villages.
[2.54:53 - 2.55:01]The speaker's office does not have investigative authority or ability.
[2.55:01 - 2.55:20]The speaker has received reports of women and girls being detained and gang-raped by Russian soldiers.
[2.55:28 - 2.55:33]The speaker did not personally investigate the use of Viagra by soldiers.
[2.55:45 - 2.55:52]The speaker's role is to provide strategic leadership on prevention and response.
[2.55:45 - 2.55:52]The investigation is being conducted by the human rights monitoring team and international commission of inquiry.
[2.55:53 - 2.55:59]The reports so far have not mentioned anything about Viagra.
[2.56:10 - 2.56:21]The speaker has no independent investigative authority and merely repeats what she is told.
[2.56:10 - 2.56:21]The speaker has engaged with the media since returning from Kyiv in May.
[2.56:10 - 2.56:21]The speaker is not responsible for investigating and does not have a mandate.
[2.57:16 - 2.57:26]The UN investigator did not attend a press conference and repeat widely debunked mass rape hoax lies.
[3.00:48 - 3.01:03]The investigation is ongoing and there is no mention of Viagra in the reports.
[3.01:30 - 3.01:37]The speaker's role is to provide strategic leadership on prevention and response.
[3.01:38 - 3.01:53]Russian soldiers have been equipped with back when other drugs and also share.
[3.01:38 - 3.01:53]The investigation is being conducted by the human rights monitoring team and international commission of inquiry.
[3.01:54 - 3.02:19]The reports include incidents of women and girls being detained and gang-raped.
[3.02:37 - 3.04:38]The reports do not mention anything about Viagra.
[3.02:37 - 3.04:38]The UN investigator did not attend a press conference and repeat widely debunked mass rape hoax lies.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker did not personally investigate the use of Viagra.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has no investigative authority and merely repeats what she is told.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has no mandate to investigate and sits in New York in an advocacy role.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The investigation is ongoing and there is no mention of Viagra in the reports.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The reports do not mention anything about Viagra.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The UN investigator did not attend a press conference and repeat widely debunked mass rape hoax lies.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has no investigative authority and merely repeats what she is told.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[3.04:38 - 3.06:37]The speaker has received reports from survivors and frontline service providers.
[2.54:53 - 3.06:37]The speaker is not responsible
[3.06:37 - 3.08:41] Mission team led by SRSG SVC, supported by 9 experts, conducted investigation into sexual violence crimes in Israel
[3.17:42 - 3.17:50]Visited 4 locations affected by October 7 attacks and gathered information on other reported incidents of CRSV
[3.17:42 - 3.17:50]Limited access to survivors and witnesses, challenges in collecting evidence due to ongoing hostilities and prioritization of rescue operations
[3.17:42 - 3.17:50]Mission team found evidence of sexual violence, including rape and gang rape, in multiple locations
[3.18:50 - 3.18:59]Lack of trust in national and international institutions hindered access to survivors
[3.19:07 - 3.19:20]Team received cooperation from Israeli government and conducted 33 meetings with national institutions
[3.19:07 - 3.19:20]Reviewed over 5,000 photos and 50 hours of footage, conducted interviews with 34 individuals
[3.19:07 - 3.19:20]Some highly publicized claims of sexual violence could not be verified by the team
[3.19:07 - 3.19:20]Overall, the team found reasonable grounds to believe that conflict related sexual violence occurred during the October 7 attacks in Israel.
[3.19:20 - 3.19:51]Limited forensic evidence and spread of evidence among various agencies
[3.06:37 - 3.20:11]U.N. report does not prove any direct evidence of sexual violence, but acknowledges the likelihood of its occurrence.
[3.20:14 - 3.20:24]Reports of conflict-related sexual violence in Kibbutz Karaza could not be verified, but circumstantial evidence suggests it may have occurred.
[3.20:25 - 3.20:33]Similar to other locations, female victims were found partially or fully naked with their hands tied and shot.
[3.20:35 - 3.20:44]The Nahalah's military base had reports of sexual violence, but they could not be verified.
[3.20:44 - 3.20:53]Forensic analysis of injuries did not reveal a pattern of sexual violence against female or male soldiers.
[3.20:53 - 3.21:11]Seven female soldiers were abducted from this base in Gaza.
[3.20:53 - 3.21:11]The actual evidence from professional forensic investigations contradicts the claims of sexual violence.
[3.21:49 - 3.22:17]The weight of forensic evidence is higher than eyewitness testimony, which is notoriously unreliable.
[3.22:34 - 3.22:44]The mission team found evidence of conflict-related sexual violence, including rape and genital mutilation, and believes it may still be ongoing.
[3.26:57 - 3.27:03]The report's main points were summarized by Evan Hill, a Washington Post visual investigator.
[3.27:58 - 3.28:04]The UN report was not an investigation and relied on information provided by Israeli authorities.
[3.27:58 - 3.28:04]The UN report admits that all information comes directly from the Israeli regime.
[3.28:05 - 3.28:28]The mission team was not able to establish the prevalence, scope, or attribution of the violations in a short period of time.
[3.29:07 - 3.29:28]The report was published as atrocity propaganda to justify Israel's actions against Palestinians.
[3.29:28 - 3.29:36]The original atrocities were not enough to support the narrative, so the same claims are recycled.
[3.30:51 - 3.31:12]This is a dehumanization tactic to justify ethnic cleansing.
[3.31:44 - 3.31:55]The suspected sexual violence on October 7 is likely valid, but the report is not an investigation and lacks clear evidence.
[3.32:41 - 3.33:21]International organizations and the US paper of record are laundering a narrative without proper investigative research.
[3.32:41 - 3.33:21]It is important to care about the truth and the lives of Palestinians and Israelis, as well as the credibility of international organizations.
[3.34:50 - 3.35:09]Key recommendations include encouraging access for human rights organizations and urging the release of all hostages.
[3.20:14 - 3.35:09]Overall, the text details reports of unverified sexual violence, contradictory evidence, and a lack of proper investigation, raising doubts about the validity of claims of conflict-related sexual violence in Kibbutz Karaza and other locations.
[3.35:09 - 3.35:18]Call on all relevant bodies to bring perpetrators to justice for CRSB crimes
[3.35:18 - 3.35:35]Encourage Israel to sign framework of cooperation with SRSG for justice and accountability
[3.35:18 - 3.35:35]Received invitation from Israel to investigate CRSB crimes
[3.36:25 - 3.36:37]Mission's aim was to gather and verify information on CRSB crimes
[3.36:50 - 3.37:00]Sent letter confirming mission details and team composition
[3.36:50 - 3.37:00]Mission team included SRSG, technical team, and public information officer
[3.37:25 - 3.37:33]Logistical and security support provided by UN country team in Jerusalem
[3.39:01 - 3.39:14]Standard of proof used was "reasonable grounds to believe"
[3.40:42 - 3.40:51]Reasonable grounds to believe that CRSB violence may still be ongoing
[3.43:47 - 3.43:55]Clear and convincing information found that some hostages were subjected to CRSB crimes
[3.45:09 - 3.45:19]Information gathered from Israeli institutions due to lack of UN cooperation
[3.45:19 - 3.45:29]Took steps in line with methodology
[3.35:09 - 3.46:34]Mission team found clear and convincing information of CRSB crimes against hostages and reasonable grounds to believe that violence may still be ongoing.
[3.59:26 - 3.59:33] The Supreme Court has made a decision to keep Trump on the Colorado ballot and reject the 14th amendment push.
[4.00:16 - 4.00:25]The court reversed a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court that would have removed Trump under the 14th amendment.
[4.00:16 - 4.00:25]Justices on both sides of the aisle appeared skeptical during oral arguments.
[4.00:25 - 4.00:40]The decision is a win for former President Trump and means he will appear on the primary ballot in Colorado and other states.
[4.00:56 - 4.01:02]The court believes it is up to Congress, not the states, to decide on matters of such consequence.
[4.01:57 - 4.02:06]This is an important decision and one of the few good things about America.
[3.46:35 - 4.02:06]The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of keeping Trump on the Colorado ballot and rejecting the 14th amendment push, stating that it is up to Congress to decide on matters of such consequence.
[4.02:15 - 4.02:23] Prisoners can run for president, but cannot vote.
[4.02:50 - 4.02:56]Felons should be allowed to vote.
[4.04:53 - 4.05:00]Decision is made on eve of Super Tuesday.
[4.07:06 - 4.07:12]It is determined that Congress, not states, can remove candidates from ballot.
[4.07:13 - 4.07:19]Supreme Court hears case about former President Trump being on ballot.
[4.08:33 - 4.08:41]Former President Trump will remain on the ballot.
[4.11:29 - 4.11:37]Three liberals disagree with the majority decision.
[4.02:08 - 4.11:37]Decision shows division within Supreme Court.
[4.11:37 - 4.11:46]Three liberal justices write on the Supreme Court decision regarding Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
[4.11:46 - 4.11:52]Justice Barrett, a Trump appointee, split off from the liberal justices.
[4.11:52 - 4.12:03]The media's influence on public opinion is noted.
[4.11:52 - 4.12:03]Some individuals disagree with the standard set by the liberal justices.
[4.12:28 - 4.12:40]Congress, not the states, holds responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal office holders and candidates.
[4.12:40 - 4.12:50]Colorado's Supreme Court's decision was overturned.
[4.13:00 - 4.13:11]Congress has not taken action on this matter in the 150 years since the 14th Amendment was ratified.
[4.13:11 - 4.13:22]The decision does not discuss whether Trump engaged in insurrection.
[4.16:43 - 4.17:35]The Supreme Court typically makes procedural and legalistic decisions.
[4.16:43 - 4.17:35]The decision emphasizes the importance of avoiding a "patchwork" of different state laws.
[4.17:45 - 4.17:57]Trump may use the decision to argue that the Supreme Court is behind him.
[4.17:57 - 4.18:12]Justices may have pushed the immunity issue back because they are not likely to find Trump immune.
[4.18:18 - 4.18:25]The immunity issue, scheduled for oral argument in April, is more important.
[4.20:40 - 4.20:59]Finding Trump immune would go against a fundamental principle of American law.
[4.21:00 - 4.22:16]The liberals' concern is that the majority went further than necessary in favor of Trump, foreclosing judicial enforcement of the provision.
[4.22:21 - 4.22:29]Trump has the right to stay on the ballot.
[4.11:37 - 4.22:35]The three liberal justices write on the Supreme Court decision regarding Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which was overturned. Congress, not the states, holds responsibility for enforcing this section and has not taken action in the 150 years since it was ratified. The decision does not discuss whether Trump engaged in insurrection, but he may use it to argue that the Supreme Court is behind him. The immunity issue, which is more important, may not go in Trump's favor. The liberals are concerned that the majority went too far in favor of Trump, potentially foreclosing judicial enforcement of the provision. Trump has the right to stay on the ballot and has reacted to the decision.
[4.22:58 - 4.23:36]Trump discusses the recent Supreme Court decision and thanks them for their unanimous decision
[4.23:45 - 4.23:55]Trump talks about how a candidate cannot be taken out of a race based on an opponent's desires and how this decision will unify the country
[4.23:55 - 4.24:09]He believes the decision will bring the country together and mentions that it will be talked about for years to come
[4.24:30 - 4.25:10]He mentions that some states did not want him to run and discusses the importance of immunity for a president
[4.25:12 - 4.25:32]Trump discusses his current legal battles and argues that they are coordinated by the White House and his opponents
[4.26:37 - 4.26:43]He mentions that he does not want to be prosecuted for decisions he made as president and that immunity is necessary for a president to make tough decisions
[4.27:28 - 4.27:34]Trump talks about his accomplishments as president, such as defeating ISIS and providing tax cuts and regulation cuts
[4.31:25 - 4.31:36]He specifically mentions a case in New York and criticizes the prosecutor and judges involved
[4.31:53 - 4.32:05]Trump concludes by stating that a president should be celebrated for doing a good job, not indicted, and that he should have immunity in his second term
[4.22:35 - 4.32:49]In summary, Trump discusses the recent Supreme Court decision, the importance of immunity for a president, his accomplishments as president, and his current legal battles. He argues that a president should be free from prosecution and celebrated for doing a good job.
[4.32:50 - 4.33:20]Trump is discussing the disclaimer on financial statements
[4.42:39 - 4.42:44]Super Tuesday approaching, candidates preparing
[4.42:39 - 4.42:44]American politics is evidence by people listening to Trump
[4.42:39 - 4.42:44]Niki Haley wins first primary in DC, first woman to win Republican presidential nominating contest
[4.42:39 - 4.42:44]Trump campaign focused on the economy
[4.42:44 - 4.43:48]Trump leading Biden nationwide in CBS poll
[4.43:48 - 4.43:57]Disclaimer states not to rely on financial statements, do your own work
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Haley sticking it out through Super Tuesday
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Battle between current and former president in 2024 campaign
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Trump's lead over Biden fueled by perceptions of the economy
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Biden campaign focusing on reproductive rights
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Biden set to deliver State of the Union address
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]New poll shows Trump leading Biden among likely voters
[4.44:00 - 4.44:14]Biden's presidency rated poor by 45% of registered voters
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Sophisticated lawyers involved in banking case
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Trump and Biden both face questions about mental and cognitive ability
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Biden trying to reframe election as a choice between Trump and Biden
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Biden's campaign strategy is focused on preserving democracy
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Biden facing difficulty convincing voters he is up for the job
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Trump and Biden both have made verbal stumbles
[4.44:17 - 4.44:24]Voters making decisions based on kitchen table issues, not verbal stumbles
[4.32:50 - 4.44:24]Trump and Biden both facing questions about their mental and cognitive ability as Super Tuesday approaches. Trump is leading Biden nationwide in a CBS poll, with the economy being a key factor. Biden's campaign strategy is focused on preserving democracy and he is facing difficulty convincing voters he is up for the job. Both candidates have made verbal stumbles, but voters are primarily focused on kitchen table issues.
[4.44:25 - 4.44:38] Bob mentions a rematch and voters are not excited
[4.47:58 - 4.48:04]48% have a negative view of the candidacy, 42% find it depressing
[4.50:45 - 4.50:50]Trump's pick for running mate will get a big spotlight
[4.50:45 - 4.50:50]Bob says Trump forgot and needs a reintroduction
[4.51:42 - 4.51:57]Bipartisan triumph as they expand Medicaid coverage, bringing healthcare to over half a million uninsured people
[4.52:25 - 4.52:36]Republicans and Democrats worked together, despite initial resistance
[4.53:59 - 4.54:20]Business community played a key role in pushing for expansion
[4.53:59 - 4.54:20]Nancy applauds the bipartisanship and says it's a big win for North Carolina
[4.54:32 - 4.54:43]Audio switches to discussing healthcare coverage in North Carolina
[4.54:32 - 4.54:43]Other states are taking notice and considering expansion
[4.54:43 - 4.54:52]Impact on campaign: conventions will be important to reintroduce President Biden and former President Trump
[4.54:43 - 4.54:52]Will they be a sycophant or someone who can appeal to different groups?
[4.54:52 - 4.56:11]Audio switches to discussing a leaked recording of German officers discussing potential strikes on Crimea
[4.54:52 - 4.56:11]Conversation also includes details of missiles provided by France and Britain
[4.54:52 - 4.56:11]Kremlin is exploiting the recording, calling it evidence of "NATO aggression"
[4.44:25 - 4.56:31]Bob mentions lack of excitement for the rematch, impact on campaign, and Trump's pick for running mate. Audio then switches to discussing bipartisan triumph in expanding healthcare coverage in North Carolina. Finally, discussion of a leaked recording of German officers discussing potential strikes on Crimea.
[4.56:32 - 4.57:13]Investigation into a leak by the BBC
[4.58:55 - 4.59:40]Leak discusses German army plans for striking Russian territory
[4.58:55 - 4.59:40]German defense minister calls it a disinformation attack by Moscow
[4.58:55 - 4.59:40]Leak does not deny contents of recording
[4.58:55 - 4.59:40]Leak is damaging to operations and embarrassing
[4.59:57 - 5.00:11]Leak also discusses possibility of Germany providing missiles to Ukraine
[5.00:12 - 5.01:07]Leak suggests Western involvement in Ukraine conflict
[5.00:12 - 5.01:07]Leak reveals inappropriate help being given to Ukraine
[5.02:15 - 5.02:37]Leak could be used as propaganda by Russia
[5.04:55 - 5.05:29]Discussion of weapons to be supplied to Ukraine by Western countries
[5.05:30 - 5.06:14]Leak shows split between Germany and other Western countries on support for Ukraine
[5.05:30 - 5.06:14]Germany needs to step up support for Ukraine
[5.06:23 - 5.06:28]Entering isolation cell in El Salvador prison
[5.07:48 - 5.08:27]Prison houses 40,000 dangerous gang members and criminals
[5.07:48 - 5.08:27]Maximum security prison with strict security measures
[5.09:11 - 5.09:23]Discussion of methods and punishments used to control inmates
[5.09:23 - 5.09:52]Prison uses technology to block cell phone signals
[5.09:23 - 5.09:52]Germany's support for Ukraine must be seen as helping a friendly country, not attacking Russia
[5.09:23 - 5.09:52]Leak is damaging to international order and must be rebuffed
[4.56:32 - 5.09:52]Leak of German army plans for striking Russian territory is damaging and embarrassing, reveals inappropriate help being given to Ukraine, could be used as propaganda by Russia, shows split between Germany and other Western countries on support for Ukraine, and highlights the need for Germany to step up support for Ukraine. Entering isolation cell in El Salvador prison, which houses 40,000 dangerous gang members and criminals. Discussion of methods and punishments used to control inmates. Germany's support for Ukraine must be seen as helping a friendly country, not attacking Russia.
[5.21:16 - 5.22:42]The video is about a maximum security prison in El Salvador
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The prison is equipped with advanced technology for searching inmates
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host expresses concern about the lack of visitation rights for prisoners
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The prison is specifically designated for terrorists and has strict security measures
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host questions the harsh treatment of prisoners and the country's high crime rate
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]El Salvador has a major issue with crime, specifically related to two American-created gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The U.S. prison system has contributed to the gang problem in El Salvador
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.23:07 - 5.23:48]The host criticizes the president of El Salvador for his actions against the gangs
[5.09:56 - 5.23:48]The video discusses a maximum security prison in El Salvador and its advanced technology, strict security measures, and lack of visitation rights for prisoners. The country has a major issue with crime, largely due to two American-created gangs. The president's controversial methods have led to a decrease in the crime rate, but at the expense of human rights. Innocent people have been caught up in the government's efforts to tackle the gangs, and there is a lack of legal rights for arrested individuals.
[5.23:49 - 5.24:08] Police shooting and beating of a woman's cousin
[5.34:45 - 5.35:05]People seeking asylum in the US due to violence in their countries
[5.34:45 - 5.35:05]MS 13 gang origins in Los Angeles in the 1980s
[5.34:45 - 5.35:05]US government's designation of MS 13 as a transnational criminal organization
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's expansion to Central America and Europe
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's activities of extortion and violence
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]US government's deportation policy leading to increased number of gang members in Central America
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Lack of support and resources for these deported gang members in their home countries
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]MS 13's relationship with the Mexican mafia
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's subservience to the Mexican mafia and payment of quotas
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Addition of "13" to the gang's name
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]US government's negligence in informing Central American governments of deported gang members' identities
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's continued growth and violence in Central America
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's continued growth and violence in Central America
[5.35:05 - 5.36:08]Gang's continued growth and violence in Central America
[5.23:49 - 5.36:08]The text discusses the origins and expansion of the MS 13 gang, as well as the US government's involvement in the deportation of gang members to Central America and the subsequent consequences of this policy.
[5.36:09 - 5.36:35]Discussion about dumping women's bodies like Sydney Swiney's juicy titties
[5.41:32 - 5.42:26]Mention of euphoria in El Salvador and its connection to crime and gangs
[5.42:26 - 5.42:47]Investigation showing that only 30% of detainees under state of emergency have any criminal connections
[5.43:07 - 5.43:18]Reference to the government's use of violence and lack of paperwork in dealing with gangs
[5.43:19 - 5.43:27]Discussion about gangs and their involvement in local drug sales and human trafficking
[5.43:19 - 5.43:27]Mention of violence and extortion within gangs
[5.43:19 - 5.43:27]Discussion about living in El Salvador and being indirectly connected to gangs
[5.44:19 - 5.44:35]Mention of the government's comparison of gangs to terrorists and the need for a crackdown
[5.45:15 - 5.45:30]Reference to a raid on a poor neighborhood and the arrest of an alleged gang collaborator
[5.45:30 - 5.45:54]Mention of the government's extraordinary powers and control through the use of guns
[5.45:54 - 5.46:08]Discussion about the lack of evidence in many cases and the potential for innocent people to be detained
[5.47:02 - 5.47:27]Conversation about conservative commentary being projection
[5.47:27 - 5.47:48]Reference to destroying the legacy of those who have died in the gangs
[5.47:48 - 5.47:58]Overall discussion of the cost of the crackdown and its long-term sustainability
[5.36:09 - 5.48:34]A conversation about dumping bodies like Sydney Swiney's, followed by discussion about gangs and their involvement in crime and violence in El Salvador. Mention of the government's use of violence and lack of paperwork in dealing with gangs, and the potential for innocent people to be detained. Overall, the cost and sustainability of the government's crackdown on gangs is questioned.
[5.48:34 - 5.48:50]Crime rate dropping due to government locking up anyone affiliated with gangs
[5.48:50 - 5.49:53]President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, boasts about reducing crime and making country prosperous
[5.51:47 - 5.53:18]Many people fear gang violence and extortion in their daily lives
[5.54:16 - 5.54:40]Questions arise about the legitimacy of the government's actions and arrests
[5.54:51 - 5.55:53]US intervention in the 60s and 70s supported a wealthy ruling class that oppressed its own people
[5.54:51 - 5.55:53]US training and arming of soldiers led to massacres and atrocities in El Salvador
[6.01:53 - 6.02:03]Many Salvadorans flee to the US to escape violence and poverty
[6.01:53 - 6.02:03]Upon arriving in the US, they face violence from gangs that do not accept them
[5.48:34 - 6.02:03]The crime rate in El Salvador is dropping due to the government's aggressive actions against gangs, but there are questions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of these actions. US intervention in the 60s and 70s played a role in creating the current state of violence and poverty in El Salvador. Many Salvadorans flee to the US to escape this violence, only to face further violence from gangs in the US.
[6.02:03 - 6.02:20] In the 1990s, gang violence and crime in Los Angeles led to the deportation of thousands of gang members back to El Salvador.
[6.02:20 - 6.02:29]El Salvador, which had just ended a civil war, saw the gangs flourish and subject its people to more violence.
[6.03:55 - 6.04:09]In 2019, President Bukele declared a state of exception, giving police the power to detain anyone without a warrant.
[6.04:12 - 6.04:57]In the first two months of the state of exception, over 35,000 people were arrested.
[6.04:12 - 6.04:57]Bukele's actions have been praised for reducing crime and dismantling gangs, but they also come at the cost of due process and civil liberties.
[6.08:56 - 6.09:13]Many innocent people have been caught in the fray and face inhumane conditions in prison.
[6.13:53 - 6.14:41]Bukele's propaganda fails to acknowledge the poverty and suffering caused by his actions.
[6.13:53 - 6.14:41]Similar patterns of targeting leftists, journalists, and artists have been seen in other Latin American countries.
[6.14:48 - 6.15:13]Bukele's actions are a drastic and potentially damaging solution to the problem of crime in El Salvador.
[6.02:03 - 6.15:33]In summary, President Bukele's actions have led to a decrease in crime and dismantling of gangs, but at the cost of violating due process and civil liberties and causing poverty and suffering for innocent individuals.
[6.15:34 - 6.15:53]Mom is a survivor of the violence of the 80s in El Salvador.
[6.22:49 - 6.23:34]Aunt almost went to jail for alleged crimes.
[6.24:22 - 6.24:32]Chad defends his actions and says system works.
[6.24:22 - 6.24:32]Chad believes this is not a good solution to the problem.
[6.24:22 - 6.24:32]70,000 gang members in El Salvador, but only 43,000 have been detained.
[6.24:58 - 6.25:14]Police union claims pressure to meet daily arrest quotas.
[6.25:14 - 6.25:58]Police report arresting people for vague reasons.
[6.25:58 - 6.26:23]Bukele changes laws to make himself more powerful.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Family becomes victim of the state.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Government killing farmers fighting for their rights.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Short term benefits are seen but long term issues arise.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]El Salvador now has highest incarceration rate in the world.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]President Bukele controls all branches of government.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Bukele seeks reelection despite constitution forbidding it.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Carlos, a victim of gang extortion, gets accused of being a gang member.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Carlos and family arrested on their way to work.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police report no evidence of gang ties for most detainees.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]DC crime bill gives police unchecked power.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Vote on DC crime bill happening tomorrow.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can designate any area a high risk area.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can arrest anyone for any kind of face covering.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can arrest anyone for any kind of face covering.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can arrest anyone for any kind of face covering.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can arrest anyone for any kind of face covering.
[6.26:24 - 6.26:56]Police can arrest anyone for any kind of face covering.
[6.15:34 - 6.26:56]Mom is a survivor of violence in El Salvador, family becomes victim of the state, police have unchecked power and can arrest and charge individuals for arbitrary reasons, causing potential harm to black individuals.
[6.26:56 - 6.27:12]Audio begins with speaker reminding audience that the discussed law is worse than the handful of provisions mentioned.
[6.30:56 - 6.31:02]Speaker expresses understanding of desire to stop crime, but states that the law will not achieve this.
[6.32:15 - 6.32:33]Video transitions to discussing the country's negotiation with gangs and accusations of cutting deals with them.
[6.32:15 - 6.32:33]The United States government also accuses El Salvador's government of protecting gang leaders from extradition.
[6.32:51 - 6.33:02]Speaker criticizes the US for deporting a gang leader and then wanting him back.
[6.34:14 - 6.34:23]Discussion shifts to El Salvador and the country's contribution to the negative situation.
[6.34:14 - 6.34:23]Speaker talks about treatment of prisoners and special treatment given to gang members.
[6.34:14 - 6.34:23]Audio transitions to discussing the insane prison system in El Salvador.
[6.36:19 - 6.36:50]Video footage shows the inside of a maximum security prison, including weapons and restraints used on prisoners.
[6.37:49 - 6.38:13]The speaker describes the lack of mattresses and constant lighting in the cells as forms of torture.
[6.38:34 - 6.39:16]Prisoners have no concept of time and all activities are controlled by guards.
[6.38:34 - 6.39:16]Medical staff come daily to distribute medication and conduct hearings.
[6.40:40 - 6.40:47]The speaker points out a room where prisoners are confronted and identified for any new crimes they may have been accused of.
[6.26:56 - 6.40:53]Audio discusses the negative impact of a law in an unidentified country and transitions to discussing the specific situation in El Salvador. The country has been accused of cutting deals with gangs and the United States government has also accused them of protecting gang leaders from extradition. The audio then transitions to discussing the inhumane conditions of the prison system in El Salvador.
[6.40:53 - 6.41:21]They give prisoners a number and use a glass that acts like a mirror to identify aggressors from a distance.
[6.42:07 - 6.42:25]The courtrooms and video call cameras allow for remote dialogue between prisoners and lawyers.
[6.44:18 - 6.45:09]The prison has high walls and electrified fencing for security.
[6.44:18 - 6.45:09]The narrator is taken to a watchtower to see the security rings and cells.
[6.47:50 - 6.47:57]Cell extractions are done daily in an orderly fashion.
[6.48:19 - 6.48:28]Prisoners are handcuffed and escorted to a designated area to prevent rebellion.
[6.48:54 - 6.49:25]Guards are afraid of retaliation from gang members and cover their faces.
[6.50:46 - 6.51:31]The narrator is shocked to learn that this group is responsible for over 200 homicides.
[6.51:31 - 6.51:46]The prisoners have tattoos indicating their former gang affiliations.
[6.51:47 - 6.52:04]The prisoners are from rival gangs, but are now united against a common enemy.
[6.51:47 - 6.52:04]The government's strategy of putting rival gang members together in cells may backfire.
[6.51:47 - 6.52:04]The majority of prisoners are not affiliated with gangs.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The government is dehumanizing some of the most violent criminals.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The narrator believes this process will not end well for the government.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The prison system is not streamlined and there are issues with underreporting homicides.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The narrator is critical of the popular support for these extreme measures.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The narrator believes the government is behaving like a gang.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The narrator is scared to be near the prisoners without protection.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The prisoners dehumanized and their humanity is taken away.
[6.52:04 - 6.52:39]The government's strategy may end up causing negative consequences.
[6.40:53 - 6.52:39]The narrator visits a highly secure prison where prisoners are dehumanized, rival gang members are placed together, and there are concerns about underreported homicides. The narrator is critical of the government's actions and believes they are behaving like a gang.
[7.04:03 - 7.04:34]The speaker is visiting a prison in El Salvador
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]They are shocked by the conditions and measures in the maximum security prison
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]They feel a sense of empowerment as a citizen compared to the criminals living in the prison
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]The prison houses criminals who have committed heinous acts, such as rape, aggravated homicides, and kidnappings
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]The speaker reads profiles of criminals with sentences of up to 270 years
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]The conditions in the prison include isolation cells, minimal food, and basic amenities
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]The prisoners are allowed to work in the prison, but are under strict supervision
[7.04:34 - 7.04:51]The speaker interviews a prisoner who has been involved in a gang since a young age and has committed multiple crimes
[7.04:51 - 7.04:58]The prison conditions are torturous and inhumane, but the speaker feels that they are necessary for criminals
[7.04:58 - 7.05:07]The prisoner regrets their actions and advises others not to get involved in gangs
[7.04:58 - 7.05:07]The speaker leaves the prison feeling relieved but also disturbed by what they have seen
[7.04:58 - 7.05:07]The speaker reflects on their belief that rehabilitation and reintegration are more effective than harsh prison conditions
[7.04:58 - 7.05:07]The speaker acknowledges that their ideology is different from the speaker's, but they defend their beliefs
[7.04:58 - 7.05:07]The speaker's ideology is the opposite of the speaker's in almost every sense
[6.52:44 - 7.05:07]The speaker visits a prison in El Salvador and is shocked by the conditions and measures in the maximum security prison. They feel a sense of empowerment compared to the criminals living in the prison. The prison houses criminals who have committed heinous acts and the conditions include isolation cells and minimal food. The speaker interviews a prisoner who regrets their actions and advises against getting involved in gangs. The speaker believes in rehabilitation and reintegration, while acknowledging that their ideology is different from the speaker's. Overall, the speaker reflects on the harsh prison conditions and their belief that they are necessary for criminals.
[7.05:07 - 7.05:47] Someone is looking at devastation and thanking people in the industry for opening doors to document and share it.
[7.05:47 - 7.05:58]They are proud of a president who has changed the country and made it safe.
[7.06:12 - 7.06:25]There is a Venezuelan prison that is like a mini version of Escape from New York, with raves held inside.
[7.06:52 - 7.07:38]The person is discussing the issue of crime and punishment in El Salvador and Peru, stating that long-term measures cannot be adopted.
[7.08:33 - 7.08:53]They believe that torture camps are not effective in lowering recidivism.
[7.13:11 - 7.13:17]The person argues that advocating for policies like torture camps could eventually lead to being a victim of those policies.
[7.15:46 - 7.16:11]They mention the CPdrc prison in the Philippines, where inmates are known for their coordinated dances.
[7.16:56 - 7.17:32]The person shifts gears to talk about China and the tension surrounding the country.
[7.17:55 - 7.18:02]They mention watching a documentary called "The Act of Killing" and how it shows that America is bad.
[7.18:15 - 7.18:20]The person mentions collective punishment and how it may not be effective in the long run.
[7.05:07 - 7.18:20]The person discusses issues of crime and punishment in various countries and argues against the use of torture camps as a solution. They also mention the CPdrc prison in the Philippines and shift gears to talk about China and collective punishment.
[7.18:21 - 7.18:42]Process of subscribing for $5 or for free with Amazon Prime account
[7.20:55 - 7.21:14]Traveling as a group to China for a challenge
[7.22:53 - 7.22:59]One free prime subscription per month for use on favorite broadcast
[7.22:53 - 7.22:59]Meeting with a guest speaker from the New York Times to discuss journalism ethics
[7.22:53 - 7.22:59]Launch of Seek Discomfort holiday drop
[7.24:19 - 7.24:30]Original member leaving and new member completing a rite of passage challenge
[7.25:06 - 7.25:16]Dropping off friends to survive in Shanghai with no money for 24 hours
[7.25:06 - 7.25:16]Completing challenges throughout the day to earn small amounts of cash for food and water
[7.25:06 - 7.25:16]Finding housing at a local stranger's house
[7.30:13 - 7.30:26]Making friends with police officers and overcoming fear of them
[7.18:21 - 7.31:36]The speaker discusses a challenge in China where they drop off friends to survive for 24 hours with no money. They also meet with a guest speaker and launch a holiday drop for Seek Discomfort. Challenges are completed throughout the day and involve interacting with locals and police officers. The goal is to push boundaries and show that people shouldn't fear each other.
[7.32:59 - 7.33:08]Man celebrates completing a challenge in China
[7.33:44 - 7.33:51]Seeks out a place to stay for the night
[7.33:53 - 7.33:58]Meets an elderly couple and asks to join them for lunch
[7.34:32 - 7.34:41]Works at a restaurant in exchange for food
[7.34:53 - 7.35:07]Joins in on a local dance tradition
[7.35:08 - 7.35:27]Gets accepted into the community
[7.37:31 - 7.37:44]Continues to work in order to get food
[7.44:21 - 7.44:45]Goes to see a friend in Taiwan
[7.44:21 - 7.44:45]Arrives in Taiwan and calls his friend
[7.45:23 - 7.45:29]Spends the day exploring and experiencing the culture
[7.31:36 - 7.45:51]A man completes a challenge in China, works for food, and then travels to Taiwan to visit a friend and experience the culture.
[7.45:51 - 7.45:59]Speaker expresses desire to leave
[7.46:10 - 7.46:44]Mentions family dinner
[7.46:10 - 7.46:44]Apologizes for leaving
[7.46:10 - 7.46:44]Family is Taiwanese, will not bow to them as it would be weird
[7.46:10 - 7.46:44]Family is Taiwanese, will not bow to them as it would be weird
[7.46:44 - 7.46:50]Learned from Twitch chat to bow
[7.46:54 - 7.47:04]Will say "konichiwa" to them as well
[7.47:11 - 7.47:17]Says goodbye and love to viewers
[7.47:11 - 7.47:17]Will see them tomorrow for more streaming
[7.47:20 - 7.48:24]Describes location as sunny Los Angeles, California
[7.47:20 - 7.48:24]References a song, possibly called "Star Love"
[7.47:20 - 7.48:24]Mentions a "star of streaming"
[7.48:27 - 7.48:42]Talks about a car and various names
[7.48:27 - 7.48:42]Mentions Tiny Bernie Sanders and the H3 podcast
[7.48:42 - 7.49:20]References a "field box"
[7.48:42 - 7.49:20]Talks about 90 Day Fiancé and champagne
[7.49:21 - 7.49:53]Mentions "a Trump Valley life" and reactions
[7.45:51 - 7.49:53]Speaker expresses desire to leave family dinner with Taiwanese relatives in Los Angeles, California. References a song and a "star of streaming", as well as other topics such as a car and various names, the H3 podcast, 90 Day Fiancé, and a "Trump Valley life" and reactions.